SCHEMBL1102726

SCHEMBL1102726

C(=C/c1c2ccccc2c(/C=C/c2ccccc2)c2cnccc12)\c1ccccc1

nearest known ligand 0.55

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
CYP11B1 P15538 1/20 0.55
CYP11B2 P19099 1/20 0.55
TRPV1 Q8NER1 1/20 0.43
NFE2L2 Q16236 1/20 0.41
IGF1R P08069 1/20 0.41
CDK2 P24941 1/20 0.41
DYRK1B Q9Y463 1/20 0.41
MAOB P27338 2/20 0.40
KMT2A Q03164 5/20 0.40
MEN1 O00255 4/20 0.40
RAB9A P51151 3/20 0.40
KDM4E B2RXH2 3/20 0.40
NPC1 O15118 2/20 0.40
MAPT P10636 2/20 0.40
L3MBTL1 Q9Y468 2/20 0.40
ALK Q9UM73 1/20 0.40
GLA P06280 1/20 0.40
MAPK1 P28482 1/20 0.40
ATM Q13315 1/20 0.40
NPSR1 Q6W5P4 1/20 0.40

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL31157158 0.82 MAPT (0.50) CYP11B1CYP11B2NFE2L2KMT2AMEN1
SCHEMBL28266883 0.82 MAPT (0.50) CYP11B1CYP11B2NFE2L2KMT2AMEN1
SCHEMBL4304901 0.82 NFE2L2 (0.56) CYP11B1CYP11B2NFE2L2MAOBKMT2A
SCHEMBL30129708 0.82 NFE2L2 (0.56) CYP11B1CYP11B2NFE2L2MAOBKMT2A
SCHEMBL4304905 0.82 NFE2L2 (0.56) CYP11B1CYP11B2NFE2L2MAOBKMT2A
SCHEMBL4288335 0.80 NFE2L2 (0.54) CYP11B1CYP11B2NFE2L2MAOBKMT2A
SCHEMBL29733698 0.76 CYP11B1 (0.50) CYP11B1CYP11B2CDK2KMT2AMEN1
SCHEMBL29733699 0.76 CYP11B1 (0.50) CYP11B1CYP11B2CDK2KMT2AMEN1
SCHEMBL1102800 0.73 KDM4E (0.54) CYP11B1CYP11B2NFE2L2MAOBKMT2A
SCHEMBL1880739 0.73 CYP11B2 (0.62) CYP11B1CYP11B2NFE2L2MAOBKMT2A

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 5 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-8153279-B2 Organic electroluminescent compounds and organic electroluminescent device using the same GRACEL DISPLAY INC. (KR) 2012-04-10 US disclosed
US-8153279-B2 Organic electroluminescent compounds and organic electroluminescent device using the same GRACEL DISPLAY INC. (KR) 2012-04-10 US disclosed
US-20100033083-A1 Novel organic electroluminescent compounds and organic electroluminescent device using the same GRACEL DISPLAY INC. (KR) 2010-02-11 US disclosed
US-20100033083-A1 Novel organic electroluminescent compounds and organic electroluminescent device using the same GRACEL DISPLAY INC. (KR) 2010-02-11 US disclosed
EP-2147962-A1 Azaanthracene-derivatives and organic electroluminescent device using the same Gracel Display Inc. (KR) 2010-01-27 EP disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20100033083-A1 Novel organic electroluminescent compounds and organic electroluminescent device using the same ORMDL3, OCIAD2, OCIAD1 CYP11B1 836/4885CYP11B2 652/4885TRPV1 460/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.