SCHEMBL1102800

SCHEMBL1102800

C(=C/c1c2ccccc2c(/C=C/c2ccccc2)c2ncccc12)\c1ccccc1

nearest known ligand 0.54

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
KDM4E B2RXH2 5/20 0.54
CYP11B1 P15538 1/20 0.44
CYP11B2 P19099 1/20 0.44
MAOB P27338 1/20 0.42
APP P05067 1/20 0.42
NFE2L2 Q16236 1/20 0.40
MEN1 O00255 5/20 0.39
KMT2A Q03164 5/20 0.39
ALDH1A1 P00352 1/20 0.39
HPGD P15428 1/20 0.39
NPC1 O15118 5/20 0.39
L3MBTL1 Q9Y468 4/20 0.39
RAB9A P51151 4/20 0.39
NPSR1 Q6W5P4 2/20 0.39
MAPT P10636 2/20 0.39
ALK Q9UM73 1/20 0.39
GLA P06280 1/20 0.39
MAPK1 P28482 1/20 0.39
ATM Q13315 1/20 0.39
LMNA P02545 2/20 0.38

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL30129708 0.80 NFE2L2 (0.56) CYP11B1CYP11B2MAOBNFE2L2MEN1
SCHEMBL4304901 0.80 NFE2L2 (0.56) CYP11B1CYP11B2MAOBNFE2L2MEN1
SCHEMBL4304905 0.80 NFE2L2 (0.56) CYP11B1CYP11B2MAOBNFE2L2MEN1
SCHEMBL4288335 0.78 NFE2L2 (0.54) CYP11B1CYP11B2MAOBNFE2L2MEN1
SCHEMBL1102726 0.73 CYP11B1 (0.55) KDM4ECYP11B1CYP11B2MAOBNFE2L2
SCHEMBL31157158 0.72 MAPT (0.50) KDM4ECYP11B1CYP11B2NFE2L2MEN1
SCHEMBL28266883 0.72 MAPT (0.50) KDM4ECYP11B1CYP11B2NFE2L2MEN1
SCHEMBL9971852 0.71 MAOB (0.52) KDM4EMAOBNFE2L2MEN1KMT2A
SCHEMBL29236430 0.71 RAB9A (0.53) KDM4EMAOBNFE2L2MEN1KMT2A
SCHEMBL9971876 0.71 NFE2L2 (0.47) CYP11B1CYP11B2MAOBNFE2L2MEN1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 4 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-8153279-B2 Organic electroluminescent compounds and organic electroluminescent device using the same GRACEL DISPLAY INC. (KR) 2012-04-10 US disclosed
US-8153279-B2 Organic electroluminescent compounds and organic electroluminescent device using the same GRACEL DISPLAY INC. (KR) 2012-04-10 US disclosed
US-20100033083-A1 Novel organic electroluminescent compounds and organic electroluminescent device using the same GRACEL DISPLAY INC. (KR) 2010-02-11 US disclosed
US-20100033083-A1 Novel organic electroluminescent compounds and organic electroluminescent device using the same GRACEL DISPLAY INC. (KR) 2010-02-11 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20100033083-A1 Novel organic electroluminescent compounds and organic electroluminescent device using the same ORMDL3, OCIAD2, OCIAD1 KDM4E 3367/4885CYP11B1 836/4885CYP11B2 652/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.