SCHEMBL12371075

SCHEMBL12371075

Cc1ccc(-c2ccc(CCC3CC(=O)O3)cc2)c(Cl)c1

nearest known ligand 0.42

Predicted protein targets (top 5)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
SIRT2 Q8IXJ6 2/20 0.39
CA3 P07451 1/20 0.38
CYP3A4 P08684 1/20 0.36
GRM2 Q14416 1/20 0.36
DGAT1 O75907 1/20 0.36

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL12371074 0.82 CA3 (0.45) CA3CYP3A4GRM2
SCHEMBL12371081 0.74 CA3 (0.45) CA3CYP3A4
SCHEMBL12371078 0.72 CYP3A4 (0.51) SIRT2CA3CYP3A4GRM2
SCHEMBL12371076 0.72 CYP3A4 (0.51) SIRT2CA3CYP3A4GRM2
SCHEMBL13953250 0.70 MMP12 (0.46) CA3CYP3A4
SCHEMBL10165804 0.70 CSNK2A1 (0.43) DGAT1
SCHEMBL19323001 0.69 HPGD (0.45) DGAT1
SCHEMBL8352429 0.68 CYP3A4 (0.60) SIRT2CA3CYP3A4
SCHEMBL12395800 0.68 TSHR (0.48) CA3CYP3A4GRM2
SCHEMBL12371088 0.68 CYP4A11 (0.49) CA3CYP3A4GRM2

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 6 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
EP-2020407-B1 2-OXETANONE DERIVATIVE AND PROCESS FOR PRODUCTION THEREOF JNC CORP (JP) 2013-07-03 EP disclosed
US-7999123-B2 2-oxetanone derivative and process for production thereof JNC CORPORATION (JP) 2011-08-16 US disclosed
US-7999123-B2 2-oxetanone derivative and process for production thereof JNC CORPORATION (JP) 2011-08-16 US disclosed
US-20090275756-A1 2-OXETANONE DERIVATIVE AND PROCESS FOR PRODUCTION THEREOF CHISSO CORPORATION (JP) 2009-11-05 US disclosed
US-20090275756-A1 2-OXETANONE DERIVATIVE AND PROCESS FOR PRODUCTION THEREOF CHISSO CORPORATION (JP) 2009-11-05 US disclosed
EP-2020407-A1 2-OXETANONE DERIVATIVE AND PROCESS FOR PRODUCTION THEREOF Chisso Corporation (JP) 2009-02-04 EP disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20090275756-A1 2-OXETANONE DERIVATIVE AND PROCESS FOR PRODUCTION THEREOF OGDH, OXGR1, OXER1 SIRT2 287/4885CA3 1873/4885CYP3A4 69/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.