SCHEMBL12548009

SCHEMBL12548009

CC1(C)OB(c2ccc(P)cc2)OC1(C)C

nearest known ligand 0.59

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
▸ LIPG Q9Y5X9 13/20 0.59
▸ LPL P06858 12/20 0.59
▸ CA1 P00915 3/20 0.49
▸ CA2 P00918 3/20 0.49
▸ CA9 Q16790 3/20 0.49
▸ CA12 O43570 1/20 0.49
▸ CA3 P07451 1/20 0.49
▸ CA4 P22748 1/20 0.49
▸ CA6 P23280 1/20 0.49
▸ CA5A P35218 1/20 0.49
▸ CA7 P43166 1/20 0.49
▸ CA14 Q9ULX7 1/20 0.49
▸ CA5B Q9Y2D0 1/20 0.49
▸ F11 P03951 2/20 0.47
▸ ESR2 Q92731 1/20 0.44
▸ P4HB P07237 1/20 0.41
▸ F2 P00734 1/20 0.41
▸ PRSS1 P07477 1/20 0.41
▸ PRSS2 P07478 1/20 0.41
▸ PRSS3 P35030 1/20 0.41

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL228212 0.88 LPL (0.71) LIPGLPLCA1CA2CA9
SCHEMBL823021 0.82 LIPG (0.59) LIPGLPLCA1CA2CA9
SCHEMBL24608995 0.81 LIPG (0.83) LIPGLPLCA1CA2CA9
SCHEMBL2707320 0.81 LIPG (0.83) LIPGLPLCA1CA2CA9
SCHEMBL28832338 0.81 LPL (0.53) LIPGLPLCA1CA2CA9
SCHEMBL64653 0.79 LPL (0.61) LIPGLPLCA1CA2CA9
SCHEMBL55445 0.77 LPL (0.59) LIPGLPLCA1CA2CA9
SCHEMBL171682 0.77 LPL (0.59) LIPGLPLCA1CA2CA9
SCHEMBL3142593 0.77 LPL (0.59) LIPGLPLCA1CA2CA9
SCHEMBL102562 0.77 LIPG (0.59) LIPGLPLCA1CA2CA9

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 2 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-7956206-B2 Metal complex CAMBRIDGE DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY LIMITED (GB) 2011-06-07 — — US disclosed
US-20080088224-A1 Metal Complex CDT OXFORD LIMITED (GB) 2008-04-17 — — US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20080088224-A1 Metal Complex AP2M1, AP1M1, AP3M1 LIPG 3816/4885LPL 1676/4885CA1 3507/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.

Send feedback