SCHEMBL13311394

SCHEMBL13311394

O=C(O)/C=C/c1cccc(-c2cnc(Nc3ccc(F)c(C(F)(F)F)c3)nc2N2CCOCC2)c1

nearest known ligand 0.47

Predicted protein targets (top 17)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
▸ PIM2 Q9P1W9 1/20 0.47
▸ FGFR1 P11362 2/20 0.43
▸ JAK2 O60674 2/20 0.42
▸ SYK P43405 1/20 0.41
▸ BTK Q06187 2/20 0.41
▸ NPC1 O15118 1/20 0.40
▸ RAB9A P51151 1/20 0.40
▸ SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 1/20 0.40
▸ FLT3 P36888 1/20 0.40
▸ STAT6 P42226 2/20 0.39
▸ AKT1 P31749 1/20 0.39
▸ JAK3 P52333 2/20 0.39
▸ MAP3K7 O43318 1/20 0.38
▸ IRAK4 Q9NWZ3 1/20 0.38
▸ ULK1 O75385 1/20 0.38
▸ TP53 P04637 1/20 0.38
▸ LRRK2 Q5S007 1/20 0.38

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL3447975 0.91 PIM2 (0.50) PIM2JAK2SYKBTKNPC1
SCHEMBL3447978 0.91 PIM2 (0.50) PIM2JAK2SYKBTKNPC1
SCHEMBL3449766 0.89 RAF1 (0.42) PIM2FGFR1JAK2SYKBTK
SCHEMBL3449770 0.89 RAF1 (0.42) PIM2FGFR1JAK2SYKBTK
SCHEMBL13311469 0.89 PIM2 (0.48) PIM2JAK2SYKBTKNPC1
SCHEMBL3447480 0.89 PIM2 (0.48) PIM2JAK2SYKBTKNPC1
SCHEMBL13311434 0.89 PIM2 (0.48) PIM2JAK2SYKBTKNPC1
SCHEMBL3447477 0.89 PIM2 (0.48) PIM2JAK2SYKBTKNPC1
SCHEMBL3449446 0.89 PIM2 (0.47) PIM2JAK2SYKBTKNPC1
SCHEMBL3449439 0.89 PIM2 (0.47) PIM2JAK2SYKBTKNPC1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 3 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20100137313-A1 HETEROCYCLIC DERIVATIVES AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF ASTRAZENECA AB 2010-06-03 — — US disclosed
US-20100137313-A1 HETEROCYCLIC DERIVATIVES AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF ASTRAZENECA AB 2010-06-03 — — US disclosed
WO-2010038081-A2 HETEROCYCLIC DERIVATIVES AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF ASTRAZENECA AB (SE) 2010-04-08 — — WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20100137313-A1 HETEROCYCLIC DERIVATIVES AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF SDHA, SDHB, UROD PIM2 3060/4885FGFR1 3917/4885JAK2 1093/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.

Send feedback