SCHEMBL13627003

SCHEMBL13627003

Cc1c(C(C)(C)C)cc(C(C)(C)C)c(OPOc2cccc3ccccc23)c1-c1c(C)c(C(C)(C)C)cc(C(C)(C)C)c1OPOc1cccc2ccccc12

nearest known ligand 0.37

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
ALDH1A1 P00352 5/20 0.37
HSD17B10 Q99714 3/20 0.37
KDM4E B2RXH2 2/20 0.37
ADRB2 P07550 4/20 0.33
ADRB1 P08588 4/20 0.33
SIGMAR1 Q99720 4/20 0.33
NR2E1 Q9Y466 4/20 0.33
CYP1A2 P05177 4/20 0.33
SLC6A4 P31645 4/20 0.33
HTR1B P28222 4/20 0.33
CYP2D6 P10635 3/20 0.33
HTR2B P41595 3/20 0.33
ADRB3 P13945 3/20 0.33
HTR2A P28223 3/20 0.33
HTR2C P28335 3/20 0.33
HTR6 P50406 3/20 0.33
MAPK1 P28482 3/20 0.33
SCN1A P35498 2/20 0.33
SLC10A1 Q14973 2/20 0.33
SCN2A Q99250 2/20 0.33

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL14452714 0.87 KDM4E (0.32) ALDH1A1HSD17B10KDM4E
SCHEMBL7206268 0.81 ALDH1A1 (0.36) ALDH1A1HSD17B10KDM4EADRB2ADRB1
SCHEMBL13627007 0.79 TNFRSF1A (0.30)
SCHEMBL13627006 0.79 ALDH1A1 (0.37) ALDH1A1HSD17B10KDM4EHTR1BMAPK1
SCHEMBL13627002 0.78 CYP2A6 (0.38) ALDH1A1HSD17B10KDM4ECYP1A2MAPK1
SCHEMBL13291473 0.77 GABRA1 (0.30)
SCHEMBL14544191 0.75 HTR1B (0.33) ALDH1A1HSD17B10KDM4EHTR1BHTR1D
SCHEMBL22071242 0.71 KDM4E (0.33) ALDH1A1HSD17B10KDM4E
SCHEMBL7211545 0.70 MAPT (0.36) ALDH1A1HSD17B10KDM4ESLC6A4MAPK1
SCHEMBL14452664 0.68 NCEH1 (0.42) ALDH1A1HSD17B10KDM4ECYP1A2MAPK1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 5 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-7615645-B2 Method for the continuous production of aldehydes BASF AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT (DE) 2009-11-10 US disclosed
US-7241857-B2 Method for producing allyl compound, and ether or ester compound produced thereby MITSUBISHI CHEMICAL CORPORATION (JP) 2007-07-10 US disclosed
US-20070083066-A1 Method for the production of 1,7-octadiene and use thereof BASF AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT (DE) 2007-04-12 US disclosed
US-7173157-B2 Method for producing an allyl compound MITSUBISHI CHEMICAL CORPORATION (JP) 2007-02-06 US disclosed
US-20070004939-A1 Method for the continuous production of aldehydes VOLLAND MARTIN 2007-01-04 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20070004939-A1 Method for the continuous production of aldehydes HRH4, HRH2, HRH3 ALDH1A1 484/4885HSD17B10 658/4885KDM4E 4664/4885
US-20070083066-A1 Method for the production of 1,7-octadiene and use thereof CYP51A1, MSMO1, HSD17B7 ALDH1A1 82/4885HSD17B10 20/4885KDM4E 2956/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.