SCHEMBL13699569

SCHEMBL13699569

CNC(=O)COC(COCCOCCNC(=O)COC(COCCOCCNC(=O)COCCOCCOC)COCCOCCNC(=O)COCCOCCOC)COCCOCCNC(=O)COC(COCCOCCNC(=O)COCCOCCOC)COCCOCCNC(=O)COCCOCCOC

nearest known ligand 0.36

Predicted protein targets (top 17)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
MEN1 O00255 1/20 0.36
KMT2A Q03164 1/20 0.36
TLR2 O60603 2/20 0.35
NAMPT P43490 1/20 0.34
GLP1R P43220 5/20 0.33
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 1/20 0.33
SLC6A2 P23975 1/20 0.33
SLC6A4 P31645 1/20 0.33
SLC6A3 Q01959 1/20 0.33
HPGD P15428 4/20 0.33
TSHR P16473 2/20 0.33
CYP1A2 P05177 1/20 0.33
CYP2C9 P11712 1/20 0.33
CYP2C19 P33261 1/20 0.33
KDM4E B2RXH2 1/20 0.33
GLA P06280 1/20 0.33
L3MBTL1 Q9Y468 1/20 0.33

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL13936563 1.00 MEN1 (0.36) MEN1KMT2ATLR2NAMPTGLP1R
SCHEMBL13699529 0.95 MEN1 (0.39) MEN1KMT2ATLR2NAMPTGLP1R
SCHEMBL13936574 0.94 GLP1R (0.34) MEN1KMT2ATLR2NAMPTGLP1R
SCHEMBL13936565 0.94 GLP1R (0.34) MEN1KMT2ATLR2NAMPTGLP1R
SCHEMBL13936543 0.90 MEN1 (0.39) MEN1KMT2ATLR2NAMPTGLP1R
SCHEMBL13699523 0.90 GLP1R (0.37) MEN1KMT2ATLR2NAMPTGLP1R
SCHEMBL13699522 0.90 ALDH1A1 (0.37) MEN1KMT2ATLR2NAMPTGLP1R
SCHEMBL13936604 0.90 MEN1 (0.39) MEN1KMT2ATLR2NAMPTGLP1R
SCHEMBL13699632 0.90 GLP1R (0.39) MEN1KMT2ATLR2NAMPTGLP1R
SCHEMBL3484552 0.88 GLP1R (0.40) MEN1KMT2ATLR2NAMPTGLP1R

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 4 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20090240028-A1 Synthesis and Application of New Structural Well Defined Branched Polymers as Conjugating Agents for Peptides NOVO NORDISK A/S (DK) 2009-09-24 US disclosed
US-20090240028-A1 Synthesis and Application of New Structural Well Defined Branched Polymers as Conjugating Agents for Peptides NOVO NORDISK A/S (DK) 2009-09-24 US disclosed
US-20090036353-A1 Insulin Derivatives Conjugated with Structurally Well Defined Branched Polymers NOVO NORDISK A/S (DK) 2009-02-05 US disclosed
US-20090036353-A1 Insulin Derivatives Conjugated with Structurally Well Defined Branched Polymers NOVO NORDISK A/S (DK) 2009-02-05 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20090240028-A1 Synthesis and Application of New Structural Well Defined Branched Polymers as Conjugating Agents for Peptides VIP, PTMS, PDGFA MEN1 1142/4885KMT2A 4517/4885TLR2 3322/4885
US-20090036353-A1 Insulin Derivatives Conjugated with Structurally Well Defined Branched Polymers INSR, IAPP, IGF1R MEN1 278/4885KMT2A 4457/4885TLR2 1081/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.