SCHEMBL145909

SCHEMBL145909

COc1cc2c(c(OC)c1)C(Cc1ccc(-c3ccccc3OC)cc1)N(C(=O)OC(C)(C)C)CC2

nearest known ligand 0.50

Predicted protein targets (top 17)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
MTNR1B P49286 1/20 0.50
GRIN2C Q14957 3/20 0.49
CYP3A4 P08684 1/20 0.48
CYP2D6 P10635 1/20 0.48
CYP2C19 P33261 1/20 0.48
MEN1 O00255 1/20 0.39
KMT2A Q03164 1/20 0.39
GHSR Q92847 2/20 0.38
HCRTR1 O43613 1/20 0.38
FKBP1A P62942 4/20 0.38
TP53 P04637 1/20 0.38
ITGB1 P05556 1/20 0.38
ITGA4 P13612 1/20 0.38
ITGB7 P26010 1/20 0.38
RXFP1 Q9HBX9 1/20 0.38
BCHE P06276 1/20 0.38
ACHE P22303 1/20 0.38

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL147825 0.89 CYP3A4 (0.45) MTNR1BGRIN2CCYP3A4CYP2D6CYP2C19
SCHEMBL151344 0.87 CYP3A4 (0.51) MTNR1BGRIN2CCYP3A4CYP2D6CYP2C19
SCHEMBL3541010 0.77 CYP3A4 (0.64) MTNR1BGRIN2CCYP3A4CYP2D6CYP2C19
SCHEMBL5090978 0.77 CYP3A4 (0.64) MTNR1BGRIN2CCYP3A4CYP2D6CYP2C19
SCHEMBL4411747 0.77 MTNR1B (0.66) MTNR1BGRIN2CCYP3A4CYP2D6CYP2C19
SCHEMBL4340905 0.76 CYP3A4 (0.58) MTNR1BCYP3A4CYP2D6CYP2C19MEN1
SCHEMBL4346397 0.76 CYP3A4 (0.60) MTNR1BCYP3A4CYP2D6CYP2C19MEN1
SCHEMBL5094541 0.75 CYP3A4 (0.59) MTNR1BCYP3A4CYP2D6CYP2C19MEN1
SCHEMBL4348524 0.75 CYP3A4 (0.56) MTNR1BGRIN2CCYP3A4CYP2D6CYP2C19
SCHEMBL4345347 0.74 CYP2D6 (0.58) MTNR1BCYP3A4CYP2D6CYP2C19MEN1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 1 patent. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20120059032-A1 1,2,3,4-TETRAHYDROISOQUINOLINE DERIVATIVES EFFECTIVE AS ANTIGLIOMA AGENTS, METHODS OF MAKING, AND THEIR USE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE RESEARCH FOUNDATION (US) 2012-03-08 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20120059032-A1 1,2,3,4-TETRAHYDROISOQUINOLINE DERIVATIVES EFFECTIVE AS ANTIGLIOMA AGENTS, METHODS OF MAKING, AND THEIR USE BAD, BAK1, CASP3 MTNR1B 583/4885GRIN2C 259/4885CYP3A4 4526/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.