SCHEMBL15064751

SCHEMBL15064751

CC(C)c1cc(-c2cc(C(C)C)cc(C(C)C)c2O)c(O)c(C(C)C)c1

nearest known ligand 0.68

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
GABRA1 P14867 7/20 0.68
GABRB2 P47870 4/20 0.68
CA1 P00915 2/20 0.52
CA2 P00918 2/20 0.52
FABP3 P05413 2/20 0.48
FABP4 P15090 2/20 0.48
GABRB1 P18505 6/20 0.48
FABP5 Q01469 1/20 0.47
RXRA P19793 1/20 0.44
PTGS1 P23219 2/20 0.41
GABRA5 P31644 2/20 0.41
GABRA3 P34903 2/20 0.41
GABRA2 P47869 2/20 0.41
GABRA4 P48169 2/20 0.41
GABRA6 Q16445 2/20 0.41
FAAH O00519 1/20 0.41
LMNA P02545 1/20 0.41
CYP1A2 P05177 1/20 0.41
CYP3A4 P08684 1/20 0.41
HPGD P15428 1/20 0.41

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL94533 0.87 GABRA1 (0.77) GABRA1GABRB2CA1CA2FABP3
Ammonia Solution, Strong SCHEMBL28098766 0.85 GABRA1 (0.74) GABRA1GABRB2CA1CA2FABP3
SCHEMBL1617739 0.81 GABRA1 (1.00) GABRA1GABRB2CA1CA2FABP3
SCHEMBL8780176 0.80 GABRA1 (0.50) GABRA1GABRB2CA1CA2FABP3
SCHEMBL6943696 0.79 GABRA1 (0.65) GABRA1GABRB2CA1CA2FABP3
SCHEMBL30467045 0.79 GABRA1 (0.65) GABRA1GABRB2CA1CA2FABP3
SCHEMBL26521897 0.77 GABRA1 (0.63) GABRA1GABRB2CA1CA2FABP3
SCHEMBL4862739 0.77 GABRA1 (0.63) GABRA1GABRB2CA1CA2FABP3
SCHEMBL6682827 0.77 GABRA1 (0.63) GABRA1GABRB2CA1CA2FABP3
SCHEMBL28111886 0.77 CA1 (0.53) GABRA1GABRB2CA1CA2FABP3

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 5 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
EP-2797938-B1 METHOD FOR PRODUCING 6-CHLORODIBENZO [D,F][1,3,2]DIOXAPHOSPHEPIN BASF SE (DE) 2016-06-01 EP disclosed
EP-2797938-A1 METHOD FOR PRODUCING 6-CHLORODIBENZO [D,F][1,3,2]DIOXAPHOSPHEPIN BASF SE (DE) 2014-11-05 EP disclosed
US-8841474-B2 Process for preparing 6-chlorodibenzo[D,F][1,3,2]dioxaphosphepin BASF SE (DE) 2014-09-23 US disclosed
US-20130172596-A1 PROCESS FOR PREPARING 6-CHLORODIBENZO[D,F][1,3,2]DIOXAPHOSPHEPIN BASF SE (DE) 2013-07-04 US disclosed
WO-2013098371-A1 METHOD FOR PRODUCING 6-CHLORODIBENZO [D,F][1,3,2]DIOXAPHOSPHEPIN BASF SE (DE) 2013-07-04 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20130172596-A1 PROCESS FOR PREPARING 6-CHLORODIBENZO[D,F][1,3,2]DIOXAPHOSPHEPIN DCPS, PLCB3, DDT GABRA1 3715/4885GABRB2 3803/4885CA1 535/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.