SCHEMBL15340937

SCHEMBL15340937

Cc1ccc(Oc2cc(N)c(N)cc2Cl)c(Cl)c1

nearest known ligand 0.46

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
ALDH1A1 P00352 4/20 0.46
CYP3A4 P08684 2/20 0.46
TDP1 Q9NUW8 2/20 0.43
TP53 P04637 1/20 0.43
THRB P10828 1/20 0.43
ALOX15 P16050 1/20 0.43
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 1/20 0.43
CD44 P16070 1/20 0.42
L3MBTL1 Q9Y468 5/20 0.41
GAA P10253 2/20 0.41
NPC1 O15118 2/20 0.41
ACHE P22303 1/20 0.41
MAPT P10636 4/20 0.41
RAB9A P51151 2/20 0.41
ATM Q13315 1/20 0.41
HPGD P15428 4/20 0.40
POLB P06746 2/20 0.40
NPSR1 Q6W5P4 2/20 0.40
MEN1 O00255 1/20 0.40
USP2 O75604 1/20 0.40

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL11421548 0.86 ACHE (0.52) ALDH1A1CYP3A4TDP1TP53SMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL15340900 0.81 TEAD4 (0.48) ALDH1A1CYP3A4TDP1TP53THRB
SCHEMBL11453570 0.81 TTR (0.58) ALDH1A1CYP3A4TDP1TP53ALOX15
SCHEMBL15340938 0.80 TSHR (0.54) ALDH1A1CYP3A4TDP1SMN1; SMN2MAPT
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL11452347 0.79 TTR (0.56) ALDH1A1CYP3A4TDP1TP53ALOX15
SCHEMBL22114126 0.78 TTR (0.50) ALDH1A1L3MBTL1ACHEMAPTHPGD
SCHEMBL22114310 0.77 L3MBTL1 (0.58) ALDH1A1CYP3A4SMN1; SMN2L3MBTL1NPC1
SCHEMBL19843836 0.76 TTR (0.61) ALDH1A1L3MBTL1GAAACHEMAPT
SCHEMBL10751638 0.75 HPGD (0.54) ALDH1A1CYP3A4SMN1; SMN2L3MBTL1GAA
SCHEMBL11420788 0.75 HTR2A (0.50) ALDH1A1L3MBTL1ACHEMAPTRAB9A

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 4 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-9695129-B2 Parasiticidal compositions comprising benzimidazole derivatives, methods and uses thereof MERIAL INC. (US) 2017-07-04 US disclosed
US-20160251317-A1 PARASITICIDAL COMPOSITIONS COMPRISING BENZIMIDAZOLE DERIVATIVES, METHODS AND USES THEREOF MERIAL INC (US) 2016-09-01 US disclosed
US-9000187-B2 Parasiticidal compositions comprising benzimidazole derivatives, methods and uses thereof MERIAL, INC. (US) 2015-04-07 US disclosed
US-20130281392-A1 PARASITICIDAL COMPOSITIONS COMPRISING BENZIMIDAZOLE DERIVATIVES, METHODS AND USES THEREOF MERIAL LIMITED (US) 2013-10-24 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20160251317-A1 PARASITICIDAL COMPOSITIONS COMPRISING BENZIMIDAZOLE DERIVATIVES, METHODS AND USES THEREOF LIPC, CYP3A43, CYP51A1 ALDH1A1 411/4885CYP3A4 25/4885TDP1 4634/4885
US-20130281392-A1 PARASITICIDAL COMPOSITIONS COMPRISING BENZIMIDAZOLE DERIVATIVES, METHODS AND USES THEREOF LIPC, CYP3A43, CYP51A1 ALDH1A1 411/4885CYP3A4 25/4885TDP1 4634/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.