SCHEMBL16618063

SCHEMBL16618063

CC1=CC(C)(O)C(C)=CC1=O

nearest known ligand 0.33

Predicted protein targets (top 17)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
KDM4E B2RXH2 1/20 0.33
MEN1 O00255 1/20 0.33
LMNA P02545 1/20 0.33
TP53 P04637 1/20 0.33
POLB P06746 1/20 0.33
GAA P10253 1/20 0.33
MAPT P10636 1/20 0.33
RECQL P46063 1/20 0.33
BLM P54132 1/20 0.33
KMT2A Q03164 1/20 0.33
TDP1 Q9NUW8 1/20 0.33
L3MBTL1 Q9Y468 1/20 0.33
PTPN2 P17706 1/20 0.33
PTPN1 P18031 1/20 0.33
EEF2K O00418 1/20 0.31
PLK1 P53350 1/20 0.31
PLK2 Q9NYY3 1/20 0.31

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL9861513 0.71 KDM4E (0.31) KDM4EMEN1LMNATP53POLB
SCHEMBL10705052 0.65
SCHEMBL2602140 0.65 CYP2C19 (0.50) LMNAMAPT
SCHEMBL16488150 0.64 RECQL (0.30) POLBRECQLTDP1L3MBTL1
P-Xyloquinone SCHEMBL49964 0.61 PLK1 (0.60) KDM4EMEN1LMNATP53POLB
SCHEMBL11800450 0.60
SCHEMBL11417626 0.58
SCHEMBL3625277 0.58
SCHEMBL4652250 0.56
SCHEMBL12346083 0.55 CYP3A4 (0.34)

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 2 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-9518076-B2 Apparatus and process for preparing reactive lignin with high yield from plant biomass for production of fuels and chemicals WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY (US) 2016-12-13 US disclosed
US-20150099868-A1 APPARATUS AND PROCESS FOR PREPARING REACTIVE LIGNIN WITH HIGH YIELD FROM PLANT BIOMASS FOR PRODUCTION OF FUELS AND CHEMICALS WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY (US) 2015-04-09 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20150099868-A1 APPARATUS AND PROCESS FOR PREPARING REACTIVE LIGNIN WITH HIGH YIELD FROM PLANT BIOMASS FOR PRODUCTION OF FUELS AND CHEMICALS HAAO, HAO2, HAO1 KDM4E 2311/4885MEN1 4879/4885LMNA 1358/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.