SCHEMBL17000273

SCHEMBL17000273

C=CN(C)Cc1cc(Nc2ccnc3cc(Cl)ccc23)ccc1O

nearest known ligand 0.76

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
▸ CYP2D6 P10635 9/20 0.76
▸ CYP1A2 P05177 8/20 0.76
▸ KCNH2 Q12809 5/20 0.76
▸ APP P05067 3/20 0.76
▸ NR4A2 P43354 3/20 0.76
▸ ABCB11 O95342 1/20 0.76
▸ CHRM2 P08172 1/20 0.76
▸ HTR1A P08908 1/20 0.76
▸ CHRM1 P11229 1/20 0.76
▸ DRD2 P14416 1/20 0.76
▸ ADRA2C P18825 1/20 0.76
▸ SLC6A2 P23975 1/20 0.76
▸ PTGS2 P35354 1/20 0.76
▸ OPRM1 P35372 1/20 0.76
▸ HTR2B P41595 1/20 0.76
▸ CYP2J2 P51589 1/20 0.76
▸ SLC6A3 Q01959 1/20 0.76
▸ HRH3 Q9Y5N1 1/20 0.76
▸ CYP2C8 P10632 6/20 0.74
▸ CYP2C19 P33261 6/20 0.74

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL10762102 0.88 CYP2D6 (0.80) CYP2D6CYP1A2KCNH2APPNR4A2
SCHEMBL20535918 0.87 CYP2D6 (0.77) CYP2D6CYP1A2KCNH2APPNR4A2
Amodiaquine SCHEMBL44152 0.86 CYP2D6 (1.00) CYP2D6CYP1A2KCNH2APPNR4A2
Amodiaquine SCHEMBL29425350 0.86 CYP2D6 (1.00) CYP2D6CYP1A2KCNH2APPNR4A2
Amodiaquine SCHEMBL29441086 0.86 CYP2D6 (1.00) CYP2D6CYP1A2KCNH2APPNR4A2
Amodiaquine SCHEMBL29430175 0.85 CYP2D6 (1.00) CYP2D6CYP1A2KCNH2APPNR4A2
Amodiaquine SCHEMBL317888 0.85 CYP2D6 (1.00) CYP2D6CYP1A2KCNH2APPNR4A2
Amodiaquine SCHEMBL12094969 0.85 CYP2D6 (1.00) CYP2D6CYP1A2KCNH2APPNR4A2
Amodiaquine SCHEMBL29788983 0.85 CYP2D6 (1.00) CYP2D6CYP1A2KCNH2APPNR4A2
SCHEMBL20536222 0.85 CYP2D6 (0.82) CYP2D6CYP1A2KCNH2APPNR4A2

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 3 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20170165254-A1 TREATING FLAVIVIRUS INFECTIONS WITH AMODIAQUINE AND DERIVATIVES THEREOF GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY (US) 2017-06-15 — — US disclosed
US-20170165254-A1 TREATING FLAVIVIRUS INFECTIONS WITH AMODIAQUINE AND DERIVATIVES THEREOF GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY (US) 2017-06-15 — — US disclosed
WO-2015120127-A2 TREATING FLAVIVIRUS INFECTIONS WITH AMODIAQUINE AND DERIVATIVES THEREOF GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY (US) 2015-08-13 — — WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20170165254-A1 TREATING FLAVIVIRUS INFECTIONS WITH AMODIAQUINE AND DERIVATIVES THEREOF EIF2AK2, HAVCR2, MAVS CYP2D6 3889/4885CYP1A2 3717/4885KCNH2 3735/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.

Send feedback