SCHEMBL1719586

SCHEMBL1719586

O=c1[nH]cc(C2CCN(CCO)CC2)c2ccc(Cl)cc12

nearest known ligand 0.55

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
OPRK1 P41145 2/20 0.50
OPRM1 P35372 1/20 0.50
OPRL1 P41146 1/20 0.50
DRD2 P14416 5/20 0.43
SLC6A4 P31645 2/20 0.43
CCR2 P41597 1/20 0.42
HTR6 P50406 2/20 0.42
KDM4E B2RXH2 1/20 0.42
ALDH1A1 P00352 1/20 0.42
HPGD P15428 1/20 0.42
KCNH2 Q12809 7/20 0.42
HTR2A P28223 4/20 0.42
HTR7 P34969 3/20 0.42
ADRA1D P25100 3/20 0.42
MLNR O43193 1/20 0.40
CACNA1F O60840 1/20 0.40
NR1I2 O75469 1/20 0.40
ABCB11 O95342 1/20 0.40
ABCB1 P08183 1/20 0.40
ADRB1 P08588 1/20 0.40

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL1719865 0.94 OPRM1 (0.47) OPRK1OPRM1OPRL1DRD2SLC6A4
SCHEMBL1719990 0.86 DRD2 (0.57) OPRK1OPRM1OPRL1DRD2SLC6A4
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL1719835 0.85 DRD2 (0.56) OPRK1OPRM1OPRL1DRD2SLC6A4
SCHEMBL1719682 0.84 HTR1D (0.49) OPRK1OPRM1OPRL1HTR6HTR1A
SCHEMBL1720073 0.84 HTR6 (0.54) DRD2SLC6A4HTR6KCNH2HTR2A
SCHEMBL1720933 0.82 OPRM1 (0.48) OPRK1OPRM1OPRL1DRD2SLC6A4
SCHEMBL1720800 0.81 DRD2 (0.50) OPRK1OPRM1OPRL1DRD2SLC6A4
SCHEMBL1720355 0.80 KDM4E (0.52) OPRK1OPRM1OPRL1SLC6A4HTR6
SCHEMBL1720745 0.78 CYP2D6 (0.53) DRD2SLC6A4HTR6KDM4EKCNH2
SCHEMBL1720032 0.77 HTR2C (0.47) OPRK1OPRM1OPRL1SLC6A4HTR6

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 8 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
EP-1566380-B1 ISOQUINOLINE COMPOUNDS AND MEDICINAL USE THEREOF MITSUBISHI TANABE PHARMA CORP (JP) 2012-01-11 EP claimed
US-7501412-B2 Isoquinoline compounds and medicinal use thereof MITSUBISHI TANABE PHARMA CORPORATION (JP) 2009-03-10 US claimed
US-20060094743-A1 Isoquinoline compounds and medicinal use thereof MITSUBISHI PHARMA CORPORATION (JP) 2006-05-04 US claimed
EP-1566380-A1 ISOQUINOLINE COMPOUNDS AND MEDICINAL USE THEREOF Mitsubishi Pharma Corporation (JP) 2005-08-24 EP claimed
EP-1566380-B1 ISOQUINOLINE COMPOUNDS AND MEDICINAL USE THEREOF MITSUBISHI TANABE PHARMA CORP (JP) 2012-01-11 EP disclosed
US-7501412-B2 Isoquinoline compounds and medicinal use thereof MITSUBISHI TANABE PHARMA CORPORATION (JP) 2009-03-10 US disclosed
US-20060094743-A1 Isoquinoline compounds and medicinal use thereof MITSUBISHI PHARMA CORPORATION (JP) 2006-05-04 US disclosed
EP-1566380-A1 ISOQUINOLINE COMPOUNDS AND MEDICINAL USE THEREOF Mitsubishi Pharma Corporation (JP) 2005-08-24 EP disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20060094743-A1 Isoquinoline compounds and medicinal use thereof PARP1, NQO1, PARP3 OPRK1 2040/4885OPRM1 3587/4885OPRL1 3210/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.