SCHEMBL17257154

SCHEMBL17257154

CO/N=C(\C)c1ccncc1C#N

nearest known ligand 0.36

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
HTT P42858 1/20 0.35
ALDH1A1 P00352 3/20 0.34
KDM4E B2RXH2 1/20 0.34
GLA P06280 1/20 0.34
GAA P10253 1/20 0.34
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 2/20 0.33
NCOA3 Q9Y6Q9 1/20 0.33
ADRA1A P35348 1/20 0.32
CLK1 P49759 5/20 0.32
CLK2 P49760 5/20 0.32
DYRK1A Q13627 5/20 0.32
CLK4 Q9HAZ1 5/20 0.32
DYRK1B Q9Y463 4/20 0.32
CYP1A2 P05177 3/20 0.31
CYP2C9 P11712 2/20 0.31
CYP2C19 P33261 2/20 0.31
MEN1 O00255 1/20 0.31
KMT2A Q03164 1/20 0.31
CYP19A1 P11511 1/20 0.31
CYP2E1 P05181 1/20 0.31

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL17257156 1.00 HTT (0.35) HTTALDH1A1KDM4EGLAGAA
SCHEMBL17256872 0.88 HTT (0.35) HTTALDH1A1KDM4EGLAGAA
SCHEMBL20384869 0.88 HTT (0.35) HTTALDH1A1KDM4EGLAGAA
SCHEMBL17256797 0.85 HTT (0.33) HTTALDH1A1SMN1; SMN2NCOA3MEN1
SCHEMBL17256795 0.85 HTT (0.33) HTTALDH1A1SMN1; SMN2NCOA3MEN1
SCHEMBL17256799 0.84 KDM4E (0.35) HTTALDH1A1KDM4EGLAGAA
SCHEMBL17256801 0.84 KDM4E (0.35) HTTALDH1A1KDM4EGLAGAA
SCHEMBL17257281 0.79 SMN1; SMN2 (0.34) HTTALDH1A1SMN1; SMN2NCOA3CYP1A2
SCHEMBL17257284 0.79 SMN1; SMN2 (0.34) HTTALDH1A1SMN1; SMN2NCOA3CYP1A2
SCHEMBL17256968 0.78 L3MBTL1 (0.51) HTTALDH1A1GAASMN1; SMN2CYP1A2

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 5 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-10030083-B2 Polymers functionalized with protected oxime compounds containing a cyano group BRIDGESTONE CORPORATION (JP) 2018-07-24 US claimed
US-20150329655-A1 POLYMERS FUNCTIONALIZED WITH PROTECTED OXIME COMPOUNDS CONTAINING A CYANO GROUP BRIDGESTONE CORPORATION (JP) 2015-11-19 US claimed
EP-3143055-B1 POLYMERS FUNCTIONALIZED WITH PROTECTED OXIME COMPOUNDS CONTAINING A CYANO GROUP BRIDGESTONE CORP (JP) 2019-09-04 EP disclosed
US-10030083-B2 Polymers functionalized with protected oxime compounds containing a cyano group BRIDGESTONE CORPORATION (JP) 2018-07-24 US disclosed
US-20150329655-A1 POLYMERS FUNCTIONALIZED WITH PROTECTED OXIME COMPOUNDS CONTAINING A CYANO GROUP BRIDGESTONE CORPORATION (JP) 2015-11-19 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-10030083-B2 Polymers functionalized with protected oxime compounds containing a cyano group PAM, PPOX, MB HTT 3188/4885ALDH1A1 3041/4885KDM4E 1669/4885
US-20150329655-A1 POLYMERS FUNCTIONALIZED WITH PROTECTED OXIME COMPOUNDS CONTAINING A CYANO GROUP PAM, PPOX, MB HTT 3188/4885ALDH1A1 3041/4885KDM4E 1669/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.