SCHEMBL17490958

SCHEMBL17490958

O=S(=O)(O)CCCc1cccc(CCCS(=O)(=O)O)n1

nearest known ligand 0.47

Predicted protein targets (top 18)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
▸ KCNH2 Q12809 3/20 0.47
▸ NPSR1 Q6W5P4 1/20 0.40
▸ PGK1 P00558 1/20 0.39
▸ PGK2 P07205 1/20 0.39
▸ APP P05067 1/20 0.37
▸ HRH4 Q9H3N8 1/20 0.34
▸ LMNA P02545 1/20 0.34
▸ TDP1 Q9NUW8 1/20 0.34
▸ NOS1 P29475 1/20 0.33
▸ NOS2 P35228 1/20 0.33
▸ HSD11B1 P28845 1/20 0.33
▸ GRIN2D O15399 1/20 0.33
▸ GRIN3B O60391 1/20 0.33
▸ GRIN1 Q05586 1/20 0.33
▸ GRIN2A Q12879 1/20 0.33
▸ GRIN2B Q13224 1/20 0.33
▸ GRIN2C Q14957 1/20 0.33
▸ GRIN3A Q8TCU5 1/20 0.33

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL17488990 0.91 KCNH2 (0.53) KCNH2NPSR1
SCHEMBL8847307 0.88 KCNH2 (0.43) KCNH2NPSR1PGK1PGK2HRH4
SCHEMBL28994131 0.84 KCNH2 (0.34) KCNH2
SCHEMBL865443 0.79 LMNA (0.57) NPSR1HRH4LMNATDP1
Water SCHEMBL27667215 0.79 LMNA (0.57) NPSR1HRH4LMNATDP1
Ammonia Solution, Strong SCHEMBL28869776 0.79 CYP1A2 (0.45) —
SCHEMBL28982964 0.78 LMNA (0.55) NPSR1HRH4LMNATDP1
Ammonia Solution, Strong SCHEMBL28869767 0.78 LMNA (0.55) NPSR1HRH4LMNATDP1
SCHEMBL17490957 0.76 PGK1 (0.46) KCNH2NPSR1PGK1PGK2HRH4
SCHEMBL4772105 0.74 LMNA (0.55) NPSR1HRH4LMNATDP1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 3 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-9826129-B2 Near-infrared-ray-absorbing composition, near-infrared-ray cut filter using same, manufacturing method therefor, camera module, and manufacturing method therefor FUJIFILM CORPORATION (JP) 2017-11-21 — — US disclosed
EP-2985639-A1 NEAR-INFRARED-RAY-ABSORBING COMPOSITION, NEAR-INFRARED-RAY CUT FILTER USING SAME, MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREFOR, CAMERA MODULE, AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREFOR Fujifilm Corporation (JP) 2016-02-17 — — EP disclosed
US-20160037034-A1 NEAR-INFRARED-RAY-ABSORBING COMPOSITION, NEAR-INFRARED-RAY CUT FILTER USING SAME, MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREFOR, CAMERA MODULE, AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREFOR FUJIFILM CORPORATION (JP) 2016-02-04 — — US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20160037034-A1 NEAR-INFRARED-RAY-ABSORBING COMPOSITION, NEAR-INFRARED-RAY CUT FILTER USING SAME, MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREFOR, CAMERA MODULE, AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREFOR FAR1, SLC39A11, NOTUM KCNH2 1898/4885NPSR1 4670/4885PGK1 4576/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.

Send feedback