SCHEMBL17701201

SCHEMBL17701201

CC1(C)OB(c2ccc(-c3c(-c4ccccc4)c(-c4ccccc4)c(-c4ccc(B5OC(C)(C)C(C)(C)O5)cc4)c4ccccc34)cc2)OC1(C)C

nearest known ligand 0.74

Predicted protein targets (top 18)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
LIPG Q9Y5X9 13/20 0.74
LPL P06858 12/20 0.74
P4HB P07237 1/20 0.47
DGAT1 O75907 1/20 0.41
CA1 P00915 2/20 0.40
CA2 P00918 2/20 0.40
CA9 Q16790 2/20 0.40
CA12 O43570 1/20 0.40
CA3 P07451 1/20 0.40
CA4 P22748 1/20 0.40
CA6 P23280 1/20 0.40
CA5A P35218 1/20 0.40
CA7 P43166 1/20 0.40
CA14 Q9ULX7 1/20 0.40
CA5B Q9Y2D0 1/20 0.40
KEAP1 Q14145 1/20 0.39
NFE2L2 Q16236 1/20 0.39
F11 P03951 1/20 0.39

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL21624614 0.97 LIPG (0.74) LIPGLPLP4HBDGAT1CA1
SCHEMBL21416280 0.95 LIPG (0.77) LIPGLPLP4HBDGAT1CA1
SCHEMBL1509154 0.95 LIPG (0.77) LIPGLPLP4HBDGAT1CA1
SCHEMBL22722776 0.93 LIPG (0.85) LIPGLPLP4HBDGAT1CA1
SCHEMBL19858597 0.93 LIPG (0.85) LIPGLPLP4HBDGAT1CA1
SCHEMBL13855173 0.91 LIPG (0.70) LIPGLPLP4HBDGAT1CA1
SCHEMBL20161075 0.90 LIPG (0.60) LIPGLPLP4HBDGAT1CA1
SCHEMBL21304574 0.86 LIPG (0.64) LIPGLPLP4HBDGAT1CA1
SCHEMBL17701207 0.86 LIPG (0.69) LIPGLPLP4HBDGAT1CA1
SCHEMBL17539979 0.86 LIPG (0.64) LIPGLPLP4HBDGAT1CA1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 1 patent. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20160118598-A1 ELECTRON TRANSPORT MATERIAL AND ORGANIC ELECTROLUMINESCENT DEVICE USING SAME JNC CORPORATION (JP) 2016-04-28 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20160118598-A1 ELECTRON TRANSPORT MATERIAL AND ORGANIC ELECTROLUMINESCENT DEVICE USING SAME HVCN1, VDAC1, SLC26A3 LIPG 2977/4885LPL 3253/4885P4HB 2301/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.