SCHEMBL17759463

SCHEMBL17759463

CC1(C)c2ccccc2-c2cc3c(cc21)c1cc(-c2ccc4c(c2)c2ccccc2n4-c2ccccc2)ccc1n3-c1ccc2ccccc2c1

nearest known ligand 0.37

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
KDM4E B2RXH2 1/20 0.37
ATM Q13315 1/20 0.37
L3MBTL1 Q9Y468 1/20 0.37
PTGER4 P35408 1/20 0.32
HDAC4 P56524 1/20 0.31
PIK3CD O00329 1/20 0.31
PIK3CA P42336 1/20 0.31
MTOR P42345 1/20 0.31
TUBB4A P04350 1/20 0.30
TUBB P07437 1/20 0.30
TUBA3C P0DPH7 1/20 0.30
TUBA1B P68363 1/20 0.30
TUBA4A P68366 1/20 0.30
TUBB4B P68371 1/20 0.30
TUBB3 Q13509 1/20 0.30
TUBB2A Q13885 1/20 0.30
TUBB8 Q3ZCM7 1/20 0.30
TUBA3E Q6PEY2 1/20 0.30
TUBA1A Q71U36 1/20 0.30
TUBA1C Q9BQE3 1/20 0.30

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL19653704 1.00 KDM4E (0.37) KDM4EATML3MBTL1PTGER4HDAC4
SCHEMBL19653719 0.97 KDM4E (0.33) KDM4EATML3MBTL1PTGER4HDAC4
SCHEMBL19652814 0.97 KDM4E (0.33) KDM4EATML3MBTL1PTGER4HDAC4
SCHEMBL19653759 0.97 TUBB4A (0.32) KDM4EATML3MBTL1PIK3CDPIK3CA
SCHEMBL19653491 0.96 KDM4E (0.37) KDM4EATML3MBTL1PTGER4HDAC4
SCHEMBL19653010 0.96 KDM4E (0.37) KDM4EATML3MBTL1PTGER4HDAC4
SCHEMBL19653738 0.95 KDM4E (0.32) KDM4EATML3MBTL1HDAC4
SCHEMBL19652952 0.95 KDM4E (0.32) KDM4EATML3MBTL1HDAC4
SCHEMBL19653038 0.93 KDM4E (0.33) KDM4EATML3MBTL1PTGER4HDAC4
SCHEMBL17760671 0.93 KDM4E (0.33) KDM4EATML3MBTL1PTGER4HDAC4

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 4 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-11130747-B2 Plurality of host materials and an organic electroluminescence device comprising the same ROHM AND HAAS ELECTRONIC MATERIALS KOREA LTD (KR) 2021-09-28 US disclosed
US-20170342057-A1 A PLURALITY OF HOST MATERIALS AND AN ORGANIC ELECTROLUMINESCENCE DEVICE COMPRISING THE SAME DUPONT SPECIALTY MATERIALS KOREA LTD (KR) 2017-11-30 US disclosed
US-20170342057-A1 A PLURALITY OF HOST MATERIALS AND AN ORGANIC ELECTROLUMINESCENCE DEVICE COMPRISING THE SAME DUPONT SPECIALTY MATERIALS KOREA LTD (KR) 2017-11-30 US disclosed
WO-2016076629-A1 A PLURALITY OF HOST MATERIALS AND AN ORGANIC ELECTROLUMINESCENCE DEVICE COMPRISING THE SAME ROHM AND HAAS ELECTRONIC MATERIALS KOREA LTD. (KR) 2016-05-19 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-11130747-B2 Plurality of host materials and an organic electroluminescence device comprising the same SOD1, TERT, TELO2 KDM4E 2736/4885ATM 3138/4885L3MBTL1 59/4885
US-20170342057-A1 A PLURALITY OF HOST MATERIALS AND AN ORGANIC ELECTROLUMINESCENCE DEVICE COMPRISING THE SAME TERT, TELO2, SOD1 KDM4E 2915/4885ATM 3046/4885L3MBTL1 37/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.