SCHEMBL1785438

SCHEMBL1785438

CC(C)(C)OC(=O)NN(C(=O)O)c1cccc(-n2cccn2)c1

nearest known ligand 0.44

Predicted protein targets (top 12)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
LMNA P02545 1/20 0.44
GPR119 Q8TDV5 1/20 0.40
KAT6A Q92794 6/20 0.40
SYK P43405 1/20 0.38
CTSD P07339 1/20 0.36
BACE1 P56817 1/20 0.36
ERCC1 P07992 1/20 0.35
ERCC4 Q92889 1/20 0.35
KDM4E B2RXH2 1/20 0.35
AKT1 P31749 2/20 0.35
TP53 P04637 1/20 0.35
GLS O94925 1/20 0.35

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL1785436 0.92 LMNA (0.41) LMNAGPR119KAT6ASYKCTSD
SCHEMBL4404243 0.75 LMNA (0.54) LMNAKDM4EGLS
SCHEMBL27519236 0.73 KAT6A (0.48) LMNAGPR119KAT6AERCC1ERCC4
SCHEMBL4757500 0.73 CTSD (0.49) LMNAGPR119KAT6ASYKCTSD
SCHEMBL21583859 0.73 LMNA (0.52) LMNAKDM4EAKT1GLS
SCHEMBL18172188 0.72 GPR119 (0.37) GPR119SYKKDM4EAKT1
SCHEMBL21583860 0.72 LMNA (0.50) LMNACTSDBACE1KDM4EGLS
SCHEMBL1786013 0.72 KCNQ3 (0.41) KAT6AAKT1
SCHEMBL6163346 0.71 KAT6A (0.47) LMNAGPR119KAT6AKDM4ETP53
SCHEMBL1785916 0.70 MEN1 (0.44) LMNAKDM4ETP53

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 3 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-8304556-B2 Thiazolyl-dihydro-indazoles BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM INTERNATIONAL GMBH (DE) 2012-11-06 US disclosed
US-20120108567-A1 Thiazolyl-Dihydro-Indazoles BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM INTERNATIONAL GMBH (DE) 2012-05-03 US disclosed
US-20110118208-A1 Thiazolyl-Dihydro-Indazoles BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM INTERNATIONAL GMBH (DE) 2011-05-19 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20120108567-A1 Thiazolyl-Dihydro-Indazoles MKI67, CYP11B1, IGF1R LMNA 2884/4885GPR119 45/4885KAT6A 4343/4885
US-20110118208-A1 Thiazolyl-Dihydro-Indazoles MKI67, CYP11B1, IGF1R LMNA 2884/4885GPR119 45/4885KAT6A 4343/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.