SCHEMBL18219201

SCHEMBL18219201

COC(=O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)C(C)=O

nearest known ligand 0.42

Predicted protein targets (top 13)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 2/20 0.42
ALDH1A1 P00352 2/20 0.40
CA14 Q9ULX7 2/20 0.36
CA12 O43570 1/20 0.33
KMT2A Q03164 1/20 0.33
CA1 P00915 1/20 0.32
CA2 P00918 1/20 0.32
HTT P42858 1/20 0.32
MGAM O43451 1/20 0.32
GAA P10253 1/20 0.32
SI P14410 1/20 0.32
MGAM2 Q2M2H8 1/20 0.32
ZDHHC7 Q9NXF8 1/20 0.30

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL11963653 1.00 SMN1; SMN2 (0.42) SMN1; SMN2ALDH1A1CA14CA12KMT2A
Acetone SCHEMBL8896210 0.88 SMN1; SMN2 (0.46) SMN1; SMN2ALDH1A1CA14CA12KMT2A
SCHEMBL590894 0.88 SMN1; SMN2 (0.50) SMN1; SMN2ALDH1A1CA14CA12KMT2A
SCHEMBL320222 0.88 SMN1; SMN2 (0.50) SMN1; SMN2ALDH1A1CA14CA12KMT2A
SCHEMBL13266324 0.88 SMN1; SMN2 (0.50) SMN1; SMN2ALDH1A1CA14CA12KMT2A
SCHEMBL6064611 0.88 SMN1; SMN2 (0.50) SMN1; SMN2ALDH1A1CA14CA12KMT2A
SCHEMBL590895 0.88 SMN1; SMN2 (0.50) SMN1; SMN2ALDH1A1CA14CA12KMT2A
Ammonia Solution, Strong SCHEMBL21219105 0.85 SMN1; SMN2 (0.48) SMN1; SMN2ALDH1A1CA14CA12KMT2A
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL1323084 0.85 SMN1; SMN2 (0.48) SMN1; SMN2ALDH1A1CA14CA12KMT2A
SCHEMBL28574653 0.84 SMN1; SMN2 (0.39) SMN1; SMN2ALDH1A1CA14CA12KMT2A

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 4 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20170157116-A1 METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR PREVENTING OPIOID ABUSE CURIA BUFFALO R&D, LLC 2017-06-08 US disclosed
US-20170151232-A1 METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR PREVENTING OPIOID ABUSE CURIA BUFFALO R&D, LLC 2017-06-01 US disclosed
US-20170016138-A1 METHOD OF PREPARING SAMPLE FOR CRYSTAL STRUCTURE ANALYSIS, METHOD OF DETERMINING ABSOLUTE CONFIGURATION OF CHIRAL COMPOUND, AND POLYNUCLEAR METAL COMPLEX MONOCRYSTAL THE UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO (JP) 2017-01-19 US disclosed
US-20160326182-A1 METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR PREVENTING OPIOID ABUSE CURIA BUFFALO R&D, LLC 2016-11-10 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (3 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20160326182-A1 METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR PREVENTING OPIOID ABUSE OPRM1, OPRK1, OPRD1 SMN1; SMN2 252/4885ALDH1A1 66/4885CA14 2053/4885
US-20170157116-A1 METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR PREVENTING OPIOID ABUSE OPRM1, OPRK1, OPRD1 SMN1; SMN2 252/4885ALDH1A1 66/4885CA14 2053/4885
US-20170151232-A1 METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR PREVENTING OPIOID ABUSE OPRM1, OPRK1, OPRD1 SMN1; SMN2 252/4885ALDH1A1 66/4885CA14 2053/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.