SCHEMBL18256998

SCHEMBL18256998

NC(=O)CC[C@H](NC(=O)[C@@H](CCC(N)=O)NC(=O)[C@H](CCC(=O)O)NC(=O)[C@@H](Cc1ccccc1)NC(=O)[C@H](CCC(=O)O)NC(=O)[C@@H](Cc1c[nH]c2ccccc12)NC(=O)[C@H](CCC(=O)O)NC(=O)[C@@H](Cc1ccccc1)NC(=O)[C@H](CCC(=O)O)NC(=O)[C@@H](CCC(N)=O)NC(=O)[C@@H](N)CCC(N)=O)C(=O)O

nearest known ligand 0.57

Predicted protein targets (top 10)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
▸ ERAP2 Q6P179 2/20 0.57
▸ GHSR Q92847 3/20 0.55
▸ LTA4H P09960 1/20 0.54
▸ NPY1R P25929 3/20 0.53
▸ NPY2R P49146 3/20 0.53
▸ NPY4R P50391 3/20 0.53
▸ IL1RN P18510 1/20 0.52
▸ ERAP1 Q9NZ08 1/20 0.52
▸ ACE P12821 1/20 0.51
▸ MME P08473 1/20 0.51

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL18079764 1.00 ERAP2 (0.57) ERAP2GHSRLTA4HNPY1RNPY2R
SCHEMBL17877082 1.00 ERAP2 (0.57) ERAP2GHSRLTA4HNPY1RNPY2R
SCHEMBL30284429 0.94 ERAP2 (0.64) ERAP2LTA4HACE
SCHEMBL17941661 0.94 LTA4H (0.59) ERAP2GHSRLTA4HNPY1RNPY2R
SCHEMBL17941660 0.94 LTA4H (0.59) ERAP2GHSRLTA4HNPY1RNPY2R
SCHEMBL17880376 0.93 GHSR (0.57) ERAP2GHSRNPY1RNPY2RNPY4R
SCHEMBL14552702 0.93 GHSR (0.57) ERAP2GHSRNPY1RNPY2RNPY4R
SCHEMBL14553988 0.93 GHSR (0.57) ERAP2GHSRNPY1RNPY2RNPY4R
SCHEMBL31485778 0.93 ERAP2 (0.57) ERAP2GHSRLTA4HACEMME
SCHEMBL18257005 0.93 ERAP2 (0.57) ERAP2GHSRLTA4HNPY1RNPY2R

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 1 patent. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20160340392-A1 BETA SHEET TAPES RIBBONS IN TISSUE ENGINEERING UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS (GB) 2016-11-24 — — US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20160340392-A1 BETA SHEET TAPES RIBBONS IN TISSUE ENGINEERING IAPP, TAGLN2, KRT18 ERAP2 524/4885GHSR 3289/4885LTA4H 4095/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.

Send feedback