Lithium Ion

Lithium Ion

SCHEMBL19328316

CC(C)c1c[nH]c2c(C(=O)[O-])cc(Br)cc12.[Li+]

nearest known ligand 0.36

Full drug profile on Sugi Atlas →

Known targets — ChEMBL curated mechanism

GSK3AGSK3BIMPA1

The experimentally established mechanism targets of Lithium Ion. The predicted profile below is derived independently by chemical similarity — agreement is a validation signal, a miss is honest.

Predicted protein targets (top 15)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
▸ GABRA1 P14867 1/20 0.36
▸ GABRB1 P18505 1/20 0.36
▸ PARP14 Q460N5 1/20 0.35
▸ NR4A2 P43354 1/20 0.32
▸ MEN1 O00255 1/20 0.30
▸ IKBKB O14920 1/20 0.30
▸ USP2 O75604 1/20 0.30
▸ ALDH1A1 P00352 1/20 0.30
▸ TP53 P04637 1/20 0.30
▸ MAPT P10636 1/20 0.30
▸ ALOX15 P16050 1/20 0.30
▸ MAPK1 P28482 1/20 0.30
▸ MAPK10 P53779 1/20 0.30
▸ KMT2A Q03164 1/20 0.30
▸ HSD17B10 Q99714 1/20 0.30

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL9288270 0.85 AKR1C3 (0.39) GABRA1GABRB1PARP14NR4A2MEN1
Lithium SCHEMBL17802201 0.84 AKR1C3 (0.38) GABRA1GABRB1PARP14NR4A2MEN1
SCHEMBL19328315 0.84 AKR1C4 (0.38) GABRA1GABRB1PARP14NR4A2MEN1
SCHEMBL17802163 0.81 NR4A2 (0.49) GABRA1GABRB1PARP14NR4A2ALDH1A1
SCHEMBL19708400 0.77 GABRA1 (0.41) GABRA1GABRB1PARP14
SCHEMBL31022882 0.73 GABRA1 (0.42) GABRA1GABRB1NR4A2ALDH1A1HSD17B10
SCHEMBL5673618 0.73 GABRA1 (0.39) GABRA1GABRB1PARP14
SCHEMBL9283757 0.71 GABRA1 (0.38) GABRA1GABRB1PARP14
SCHEMBL31023069 0.71 GABRA1 (0.40) GABRA1GABRB1PARP14NR4A2ALDH1A1
SCHEMBL30993004 0.69 CREBBP (0.45) GABRA1GABRB1PARP14NR4A2KMT2A

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 3 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
EP-3227275-B1 CD38 INHIBITORS AND METHODS OF TREATMENT GLAXOSMITHKLINE IP NO 2 LTD (GB) 2019-01-02 — — EP disclosed
US-9840496-B2 CD38 inhibitors and methods of treatment GLAXOSMITHKLINE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY (NO.2) LIMITED (GB) 2017-12-12 — — US disclosed
US-20170260164-A1 CD38 INHIBITORS AND METHODS OF TREATMENT GLAXOSMITHKLINE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY (NO.2) LIMITED (GB) 2017-09-14 — — US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20170260164-A1 CD38 INHIBITORS AND METHODS OF TREATMENT CD38, NQO1, NADK GABRA1 3799/4885GABRB1 3334/4885PARP14 55/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.

Send feedback