SCHEMBL19345656

SCHEMBL19345656

CNc1ccc(C(=O)NC(C)C(=O)O)cc1

nearest known ligand 0.59

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
▸ CA2 P00918 5/20 0.59
▸ CA1 P00915 4/20 0.59
▸ CA12 O43570 1/20 0.50
▸ CA9 Q16790 1/20 0.50
▸ DGAT1 O75907 1/20 0.47
▸ HDAC4 P56524 1/20 0.42
▸ HDAC7 Q8WUI4 1/20 0.42
▸ HDAC8 Q9BY41 1/20 0.42
▸ HDAC6 Q9UBN7 1/20 0.42
▸ HDAC9 Q9UKV0 1/20 0.42
▸ HDAC5 Q9UQL6 1/20 0.42
▸ KDM4C Q9H3R0 1/20 0.42
▸ ALDH1A1 P00352 3/20 0.41
▸ LMNA P02545 2/20 0.41
▸ MEN1 O00255 2/20 0.41
▸ KMT2A Q03164 2/20 0.41
▸ CYP1A2 P05177 1/20 0.41
▸ ALOX15 P16050 1/20 0.41
▸ CYP2C19 P33261 1/20 0.41
▸ PTGS2 P35354 1/20 0.41

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL11103451 0.89 CA2 (0.71) CA2CA1CA12CA9DGAT1
SCHEMBL11103438 0.89 CA2 (0.71) CA2CA1CA12CA9DGAT1
SCHEMBL13761376 0.83 MLYCD (0.58) HDAC4ALDH1A1LMNAMEN1KMT2A
SCHEMBL821456 0.81 CA2 (0.63) CA2CA1CA12CA9HDAC6
SCHEMBL1981446 0.81 CA2 (0.63) CA2CA1CA12CA9HDAC6
SCHEMBL12302109 0.81 CA2 (0.63) CA2CA1CA12CA9HDAC6
SCHEMBL698879 0.81 CA1 (0.62) CA2CA1CA12CA9DGAT1
SCHEMBL2796740 0.81 CA1 (0.62) CA2CA1CA12CA9DGAT1
SCHEMBL698880 0.81 CA1 (0.62) CA2CA1CA12CA9DGAT1
SCHEMBL3995339 0.80 NPC1 (0.63) CA2CA1CA12CA9ALDH1A1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 1 patent. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20170258861-A1 Treatment of Herpes, Pseudomonas, Staph, and Hepatitis SQUIRES MERYL J (US) 2017-09-14 — — US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20170258861-A1 Treatment of Herpes, Pseudomonas, Staph, and Hepatitis NISCH, CUTA, HRH1 CA2 277/4885CA1 629/4885CA12 250/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.

Send feedback