SCHEMBL19726109

SCHEMBL19726109

CCC1O[C@H](OCC2O[C@H](C)C(OCc3ccccc3)[C@@H](O[C@H]3O[C@@H](CC)[C@@H](C)C(C)C3OC(C)=O)[C@@H]2C)C(OC(C)=O)[C@@H](C)[C@@H]1C

nearest known ligand 0.39

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
▸ FGF1 P05230 2/20 0.39
▸ FGF2 P09038 2/20 0.39
▸ VEGFA P15692 2/20 0.39
▸ HPSE Q9Y251 2/20 0.39
▸ LMNA P02545 2/20 0.39
▸ KMT2A Q03164 1/20 0.36
▸ CYP2D6 P10635 1/20 0.36
▸ ALDH1A1 P00352 1/20 0.36
▸ MAPK1 P28482 1/20 0.36
▸ POLB P06746 1/20 0.35
▸ NT5E P21589 1/20 0.35
▸ SELP P16109 2/20 0.35
▸ TSHR P16473 1/20 0.34
▸ SLC6A2 P23975 1/20 0.34
▸ SSTR1 P30872 1/20 0.34
▸ SSTR2 P30874 1/20 0.34
▸ SSTR4 P31391 1/20 0.34
▸ SSTR3 P32745 1/20 0.34
▸ SSTR5 P35346 1/20 0.34
▸ GJB2 P29033 1/20 0.34

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL19726090 0.99 FGF1 (0.38) FGF1FGF2VEGFAHPSELMNA
SCHEMBL19726110 0.91 FGF1 (0.38) FGF1FGF2VEGFAHPSELMNA
SCHEMBL17305583 0.86 NT5E (0.43) FGF1FGF2VEGFAHPSENT5E
SCHEMBL17300482 0.86 NT5E (0.43) FGF1FGF2VEGFAHPSENT5E
SCHEMBL17299316 0.86 NT5E (0.43) FGF1FGF2VEGFAHPSENT5E
SCHEMBL17305587 0.86 NT5E (0.43) FGF1FGF2VEGFAHPSENT5E
SCHEMBL19726185 0.86 SELP (0.35) FGF1FGF2VEGFAHPSELMNA
SCHEMBL17300488 0.86 NT5E (0.43) FGF1FGF2VEGFAHPSENT5E
SCHEMBL17299308 0.86 NT5E (0.43) FGF1FGF2VEGFAHPSENT5E
SCHEMBL17521890 0.85 ALDH1A1 (0.40) LMNAKMT2ACYP2D6ALDH1A1MAPK1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 1 patent. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20170362265-A1 METHODS FOR MODULAR SYNTHESIS OF N-GLYCANS AND ARRAYS THEREOF ACADEMIA SINICA (TW) 2017-12-21 — — US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20170362265-A1 METHODS FOR MODULAR SYNTHESIS OF N-GLYCANS AND ARRAYS THEREOF SIGLEC7, SIGLEC9, CD4 FGF1 4725/4885FGF2 4570/4885VEGFA 1108/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.

Send feedback