SCHEMBL2015126

SCHEMBL2015126

CCN1CC(C)(C)OC(=O)C1CC(=O)Nc1cccnc1

nearest known ligand 0.47

Predicted protein targets (top 14)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
MAPT P10636 8/20 0.47
POLB P06746 2/20 0.46
LMNA P02545 2/20 0.44
KMT2A Q03164 2/20 0.44
MEN1 O00255 1/20 0.44
USP2 O75604 1/20 0.44
ALDH1A1 P00352 1/20 0.43
HSP90AA1 P07900 1/20 0.43
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 2/20 0.42
MAPK1 P28482 1/20 0.42
PIK3R1 P27986 1/20 0.42
MTOR P42345 1/20 0.42
NAMPT P43490 1/20 0.41
GAA P10253 1/20 0.40

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL3219024 0.83 MAPT (0.68) MAPTPOLBLMNAKMT2AALDH1A1
SCHEMBL2015307 0.75 MAPT (0.47) MAPTPOLBLMNAKMT2AMEN1
SCHEMBL2013918 0.73 MAPT (0.40) MAPTPOLBLMNAKMT2AALDH1A1
SCHEMBL2016096 0.73 SMN1; SMN2 (0.53) MAPTPOLBLMNAKMT2AMEN1
SCHEMBL16168628 0.72 MAPT (0.36) MAPTPOLBKMT2AALDH1A1HSP90AA1
SCHEMBL2013591 0.71 ALDH1A1 (0.45) MAPTPOLBLMNAKMT2AMEN1
SCHEMBL3134801 0.70 LMNA (0.45) POLBLMNAKMT2AMEN1USP2
SCHEMBL3134782 0.70 LMNA (0.45) POLBLMNAKMT2AMEN1USP2
SCHEMBL2014175 0.70 MAPT (0.35) MAPTPOLBLMNAKMT2AALDH1A1
SCHEMBL2011699 0.70 LMNA (0.46) MAPTLMNAKMT2AMEN1ALDH1A1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 9 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
EP-2513069-B1 ANTIFUNGAL COMPOUNDS UNIV LEUVEN KATH (BE) 2014-10-15 EP claimed
EP-2513069-A1 ANTIFUNGAL COMPOUNDS Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (BE) 2012-10-24 EP claimed
US-20120252801-A1 ANTIFUNGAL COMPOUNDS KATHOLIEKE UNIVERSITEIT LEUVEN, K.U.LEUVEN R&D (BE) 2012-10-04 US claimed
WO-2011072345-A1 ANTIFUNGAL COMPOUNDS KATHOLIEKE UNIVERSITEIT LEUVEN (BE) 2011-06-23 WO claimed
EP-2513069-B1 ANTIFUNGAL COMPOUNDS UNIV LEUVEN KATH (BE) 2014-10-15 EP disclosed
EP-2513069-A1 ANTIFUNGAL COMPOUNDS Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (BE) 2012-10-24 EP disclosed
US-20120252801-A1 ANTIFUNGAL COMPOUNDS KATHOLIEKE UNIVERSITEIT LEUVEN, K.U.LEUVEN R&D (BE) 2012-10-04 US disclosed
US-20120252801-A1 ANTIFUNGAL COMPOUNDS KATHOLIEKE UNIVERSITEIT LEUVEN, K.U.LEUVEN R&D (BE) 2012-10-04 US disclosed
WO-2011072345-A1 ANTIFUNGAL COMPOUNDS KATHOLIEKE UNIVERSITEIT LEUVEN (BE) 2011-06-23 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20120252801-A1 ANTIFUNGAL COMPOUNDS ERG28, DPM1, CYP51A1 MAPT 809/4885POLB 3581/4885LMNA 3928/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.