SCHEMBL20161927

SCHEMBL20161927

CCCCCCCCCCCCCCNC(=O)C(C)C1O[C@H](CO)[C@@H](OC2O[C@H](CO)[C@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@H]2O)[C@H](O)[C@H]1O

nearest known ligand 0.51

Predicted protein targets (top 9)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
GJB2 P29033 2/20 0.46
LGALS8 O00214 2/20 0.44
LGALS3 P17931 2/20 0.44
LGALS4 P56470 2/20 0.44
IGF2R P11717 1/20 0.41
MAPK1 P28482 1/20 0.41
SELL P14151 2/20 0.40
SELP P16109 2/20 0.40
TLR4 O00206 1/20 0.40

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL20161635 1.00 GJB2 (0.46) GJB2LGALS8LGALS3LGALS4IGF2R
SCHEMBL20161934 0.92 LGALS8 (0.42) GJB2LGALS8LGALS3LGALS4IGF2R
SCHEMBL20161460 0.90 GJB2 (0.46) GJB2LGALS8LGALS3LGALS4IGF2R
SCHEMBL20161932 0.88 EPHX2 (0.42) MAPK1
SCHEMBL20161562 0.88 EPHX2 (0.42) MAPK1
SCHEMBL20161921 0.88 EPHX2 (0.42) MAPK1
SCHEMBL20161629 0.88 EPHX2 (0.42) MAPK1
SCHEMBL20161322 0.88 EPHX2 (0.42) MAPK1
SCHEMBL20161657 0.88 EPHX2 (0.42) MAPK1
Cellobiose SCHEMBL8665127 0.86 GJB2 (0.46) GJB2LGALS8LGALS3LGALS4IGF2R

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 2 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-11045411-B2 Process for treating keratin materials using amide, acid or ester c-glycoside derivatives, and cosmetic composition containing same L'OREAL (FR) 2021-06-29 US disclosed
US-20180133137-A1 PROCESS FOR TREATING KERATIN MATERIALS USING AMIDE, ACID OR ESTER C-GLYCOSIDE DERIVATIVES, AND COSMETIC COMPOSITION CONTAINING SAME L'OREAL (FR) 2018-05-17 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20180133137-A1 PROCESS FOR TREATING KERATIN MATERIALS USING AMIDE, ACID OR ESTER C-GLYCOSIDE DERIVATIVES, AND COSMETIC COMPOSITION CONTAINING SAME KRT18, CUTA, GLA GJB2 4377/4885LGALS8 270/4885LGALS3 403/4885
US-11045411-B2 Process for treating keratin materials using amide, acid or ester c-glycoside derivatives, and cosmetic composition containing same KRT18, CUTA, GLA GJB2 4377/4885LGALS8 270/4885LGALS3 403/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.