SCHEMBL203469

SCHEMBL203469

CC1CNc2nc3c(N)nc4ccccc4c3n21

nearest known ligand 0.44

Predicted protein targets (top 13)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
TLR7 Q9NYK1 18/20 0.44
TLR8 Q9NR97 8/20 0.42
NUDT1 P36639 2/20 0.41
LMNA P02545 1/20 0.41
POLB P06746 1/20 0.41
HRH2 P25021 1/20 0.41
ADRA1D P25100 1/20 0.41
HTR2A P28223 1/20 0.41
ADORA2A P29274 1/20 0.41
ADRA1A P35348 1/20 0.41
HTR2B P41595 1/20 0.41
PDE4D Q08499 1/20 0.41
KCNH2 Q12809 1/20 0.41

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL205116 1.00 TLR7 (0.44) TLR7TLR8NUDT1LMNAPOLB
SCHEMBL202388 1.00 TLR7 (0.44) TLR7TLR8NUDT1LMNAPOLB
SCHEMBL203276 0.76 CYP3A4 (0.36) TLR7LMNA
SCHEMBL203764 0.76 CYP3A4 (0.36) TLR7LMNA
SCHEMBL1774712 0.74 TLR7 (0.40) TLR7TLR8NUDT1LMNAPOLB
SCHEMBL1774780 0.73 TLR7 (0.42) TLR7TLR8
SCHEMBL10237186 0.72 TLR7 (0.44) TLR7TLR8NUDT1LMNAPOLB
SCHEMBL1773813 0.72 TLR7 (0.44) TLR7TLR8NUDT1LMNAPOLB
SCHEMBL2087126 0.72 TLR7 (0.45) TLR7TLR8
SCHEMBL4796636 0.72 TLR7 (0.45) TLR7TLR8

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 6 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-8088788-B2 Substituted fused[1,2] imidazo[4,5-c] ring compounds and methods 3M INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES COMPANY (US) 2012-01-03 US disclosed
US-8088788-B2 Substituted fused[1,2] imidazo[4,5-c] ring compounds and methods 3M INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES COMPANY (US) 2012-01-03 US disclosed
US-8088788-B2 Substituted fused[1,2] imidazo[4,5-c] ring compounds and methods 3M INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES COMPANY (US) 2012-01-03 US disclosed
US-20090221551-A1 SUBSTITUTED FUSED[1,2] IMIDAZO[4,5C] RING COMPOUNDS AND METHODS PFIZER INC. 2009-09-03 US disclosed
US-20090221551-A1 SUBSTITUTED FUSED[1,2] IMIDAZO[4,5C] RING COMPOUNDS AND METHODS PFIZER INC. 2009-09-03 US disclosed
US-20090221551-A1 SUBSTITUTED FUSED[1,2] IMIDAZO[4,5C] RING COMPOUNDS AND METHODS PFIZER INC. 2009-09-03 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20090221551-A1 SUBSTITUTED FUSED[1,2] IMIDAZO[4,5C] RING COMPOUNDS AND METHODS IL2, IFNG, IL4 TLR7 69/4885TLR8 217/4885NUDT1 553/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.