SCHEMBL21184337

SCHEMBL21184337

CO[C@@H]1[C@H](O)[C@@H](COP(=O)(O)OCCOCCOP(=O)(O)OC)O[C@H]1n1cnc2c(=O)[nH]c(N)nc21

nearest known ligand 0.60

Predicted protein targets (top 13)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
TGM2 P21980 1/20 0.60
NT5E P21589 1/20 0.60
KRAS P01116 10/20 0.59
TAS1R3 Q7RTX0 1/20 0.57
TAS1R1 Q7RTX1 1/20 0.57
FUT5 Q11128 1/20 0.56
IMPDH2 P12268 1/20 0.53
IMPDH1 P20839 1/20 0.53
P2RY2 P41231 1/20 0.52
P2RY4 P51582 1/20 0.52
P2RY6 Q15077 1/20 0.52
HINT1 P49773 1/20 0.52
DCPS Q96C86 1/20 0.52

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL21413953 0.93 NT5E (0.70) TGM2NT5EKRASFUT5IMPDH2
SCHEMBL21184323 0.91 TGM2 (0.68) TGM2NT5EKRASTAS1R3TAS1R1
SCHEMBL19325472 0.91 TGM2 (0.68) TGM2NT5EKRASTAS1R3TAS1R1
SCHEMBL18763616 0.91 TGM2 (0.68) TGM2NT5EKRASTAS1R3TAS1R1
SCHEMBL31309461 0.90 TGM2 (0.61) TGM2NT5EKRASTAS1R3TAS1R1
Ammonia Solution, Strong SCHEMBL31309792 0.89 TGM2 (0.60) TGM2NT5EKRASTAS1R3TAS1R1
SCHEMBL24322609 0.89 NT5E (0.75) TGM2NT5EKRASFUT5IMPDH2
SCHEMBL18769051 0.89 NT5E (0.75) TGM2NT5EKRASFUT5IMPDH2
SCHEMBL18769050 0.89 NT5E (0.75) TGM2NT5EKRASFUT5IMPDH2
SCHEMBL21171613 0.89 NT5E (0.75) TGM2NT5EKRASFUT5IMPDH2

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 2 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-10570388-B2 Phosphate replacement MRNA cap analogs MODERNATX, INC. (US) 2020-02-25 US disclosed
US-20190225644-A1 MRNA CAP ANALOGS AND METHODS OF MRNA CAPPING MODERNATX, INC. 2019-07-25 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-10570388-B2 Phosphate replacement MRNA cap analogs RNGTT, RNMT, CPSF6 TGM2 3627/4885NT5E 518/4885KRAS 2714/4885
US-20190225644-A1 MRNA CAP ANALOGS AND METHODS OF MRNA CAPPING RNGTT, RNMT, NSUN2 TGM2 3563/4885NT5E 572/4885KRAS 2726/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.