Ribose (Furanose)

Ribose (Furanose)

SCHEMBL218015

NC(=O)c1[nH]cnc1N.OC[C@H]1OC(O)[C@H](O)[C@@H]1O

nearest known ligand 0.59

Full drug profile on Sugi Atlas →

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
GDA Q9Y2T3 1/20 0.59
UMPS P11172 1/20 0.45
KDM4E B2RXH2 2/20 0.44
TP53 P04637 2/20 0.44
TDP1 Q9NUW8 1/20 0.44
MAPT P10636 1/20 0.44
LMNA P02545 5/20 0.42
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 3/20 0.42
ALDH1A1 P00352 3/20 0.42
TSHR P16473 2/20 0.42
THPO P40225 2/20 0.42
PMP22 Q01453 2/20 0.42
GLA P06280 1/20 0.42
EIF4E P06730 1/20 0.42
CYP3A4 P08684 1/20 0.42
TOP1 P11387 1/20 0.42
ADORA1 P30542 1/20 0.42
HTT P42858 2/20 0.41
BLM P54132 2/20 0.41
GAA P10253 1/20 0.41

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
Ribose (Furanose) SCHEMBL164883 0.81 KDM4E (0.50) UMPSKDM4ETP53TDP1MAPT
Ribose (Furanose) SCHEMBL1040051 0.81 KDM4E (0.50) UMPSKDM4ETP53TDP1MAPT
Ribose (Furanose) SCHEMBL28792915 0.78 SMN1; SMN2 (0.50) UMPSKDM4ETP53TDP1MAPT
SCHEMBL94902 0.77
SCHEMBL11059647 0.76 SLC5A1 (0.47) UMPSALDH1A1CDK1CCNB1
SCHEMBL11051432 0.76 SLC5A1 (0.47) UMPSALDH1A1CDK1CCNB1
SCHEMBL11061125 0.76 SLC5A1 (0.47) UMPSALDH1A1CDK1CCNB1
SCHEMBL11061122 0.76 SLC5A1 (0.47) UMPSALDH1A1CDK1CCNB1
SCHEMBL11054104 0.76 SLC5A1 (0.47) UMPSALDH1A1CDK1CCNB1
SCHEMBL11051427 0.76 SLC5A1 (0.47) UMPSALDH1A1CDK1CCNB1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 6 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-8088752-B2 Methods for metabolic modulation VDF FUTURECEUTICALS, INC. (US) 2012-01-03 US disclosed
US-20090203638-A1 PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR METABOLIC MODULATION VDF FUTURECEUTICALS, INC. (US) 2009-08-13 US disclosed
US-20070161582-A1 Pharmaceutical compositions and methods for metabolic modulation VDF FUTURECEUTICALS 2007-07-12 US disclosed
WO-2005020892-A2 PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR METABOLIC MODULATION MITOCHROMA RESEARCH, INC. (US) 2005-03-10 WO disclosed
US-4900407-A Method for deoxygenation of alcohols YAMASA SHOYU KABUSHIKI KAISHA (JP) 1990-02-13 US disclosed
EP-0238672-A1 PROCESS FOR DEOXIDIZING ALCOHOL Yamasa Shoyu Kabushiki Kaisha (JP) 1987-09-30 EP disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20070161582-A1 Pharmaceutical compositions and methods for metabolic modulation GPR119, PRKAG2, PRKAG1 GDA 671/4885UMPS 239/4885KDM4E 4093/4885
US-20090203638-A1 PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR METABOLIC MODULATION GPR119, PRKAG2, GCKR GDA 656/4885UMPS 226/4885KDM4E 4031/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.