SCHEMBL2296499

SCHEMBL2296499

CCCCCn1c(O)nc2ncc(Cl)c(-c3ccc(OC(F)(F)F)cc3)c21

nearest known ligand 0.38

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
MERTK Q12866 1/20 0.38
SCN9A Q15858 1/20 0.37
F2RL3 Q96RI0 5/20 0.34
CYP1A2 P05177 2/20 0.34
CYP3A4 P08684 2/20 0.34
CYP2C9 P11712 2/20 0.34
CYP2D6 P10635 1/20 0.34
ABL1 P00519 2/20 0.33
BCR P11274 2/20 0.33
HRH2 P25021 1/20 0.33
HRH1 P35367 1/20 0.33
NTRK1 P04629 1/20 0.33
ACLY P53396 1/20 0.33
KDM2B Q8NHM5 1/20 0.32
TUBB4A P04350 1/20 0.32
TUBB P07437 1/20 0.32
TUBA3C P0DPH7 1/20 0.32
TUBA1B P68363 1/20 0.32
TUBA4A P68366 1/20 0.32
TUBB4B P68371 1/20 0.32

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL2297981 0.90 PIM1 (0.39) F2RL3ACLY
SCHEMBL2298091 0.87 TLR8 (0.41)
SCHEMBL2299443 0.86 TLR8 (0.38)
SCHEMBL2300694 0.85 TLR8 (0.39) CYP1A2CYP2C9
SCHEMBL2299677 0.85 ESR1 (0.38) CYP3A4
SCHEMBL2297571 0.84 TLR8 (0.37)
SCHEMBL2298814 0.83 KDM4E (0.42) PDE4B
SCHEMBL2298472 0.82 RIPK3 (0.35) CYP3A4CYP2D6PDE4B
SCHEMBL2300201 0.82 PGR (0.36) PDE4B
SCHEMBL2299848 0.81 RARB (0.41)

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 8 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20110312975-A1 CERTAIN CHEMICAL ENTITIES, COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS YANG ZHE (US) 2011-12-22 US claimed
EP-2244711-A1 CERTAIN CHEMICAL ENTITIES, COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS Cytokinetics, Incorporated (US) 2010-11-03 EP claimed
US-20090253737-A1 CERTAIN CHEMICAL ENTITIES, COMPOSITIONS, AND METHODS CYTOKINETICS, INCORPORATED 2009-10-08 US claimed
WO-2009099594-A1 CERTAIN CHEMICAL ENTITIES, COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS CYTOKINETICS, INCORPORATED (US) 2009-08-13 WO claimed
US-7989469-B2 Certain chemical entities, compositions, and methods CYTOKINETICS, INCORPORATED (US) 2011-08-02 US disclosed
EP-2244711-A1 CERTAIN CHEMICAL ENTITIES, COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS Cytokinetics, Incorporated (US) 2010-11-03 EP disclosed
US-20090253737-A1 CERTAIN CHEMICAL ENTITIES, COMPOSITIONS, AND METHODS CYTOKINETICS, INCORPORATED 2009-10-08 US disclosed
WO-2009099594-A1 CERTAIN CHEMICAL ENTITIES, COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS CYTOKINETICS, INCORPORATED (US) 2009-08-13 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20090253737-A1 CERTAIN CHEMICAL ENTITIES, COMPOSITIONS, AND METHODS TNNC1, TNNI3, TNNT2 MERTK 727/4885SCN9A 1026/4885F2RL3 2959/4885
US-20110312975-A1 CERTAIN CHEMICAL ENTITIES, COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS TNNC1, TNNI3, TNNT2 MERTK 900/4885SCN9A 1391/4885F2RL3 2886/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.