SCHEMBL2536661

SCHEMBL2536661

O=C(Nc1nc2ccc(Sc3cnc4ncc(OC5CCCCC5)cn34)cc2s1)C1CC1

nearest known ligand 0.49

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
NPC1 O15118 6/20 0.49
RAB9A P51151 5/20 0.49
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 2/20 0.49
MEN1 O00255 2/20 0.49
KMT2A Q03164 2/20 0.49
GFER P55789 1/20 0.49
MAOA P21397 1/20 0.48
MAOB P27338 1/20 0.48
ALDH1A1 P00352 2/20 0.47
LMNA P02545 1/20 0.45
MAPK1 P28482 1/20 0.45
CASP3 P42574 1/20 0.45
SENP8 Q96LD8 1/20 0.45
SENP7 Q9BQF6 1/20 0.45
SENP6 Q9GZR1 1/20 0.45
ABL1 P00519 4/20 0.44
CLK1 P49759 1/20 0.44
HSP90AA1 P07900 1/20 0.44
MET P08581 3/20 0.44
USP2 O75604 1/20 0.44

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL1841257 0.80 CASP3 (0.50) NPC1RAB9ASMN1; SMN2MEN1KMT2A
SCHEMBL2540722 0.79 MET (0.52) NPC1RAB9AMEN1KMT2ACASP3
SCHEMBL2542571 0.78 ABL1 (0.56) NPC1RAB9ASMN1; SMN2MEN1KMT2A
SCHEMBL2541319 0.77 MET (0.46) NPC1RAB9AMEN1KMT2ACASP3
SCHEMBL1838470 0.76 CASP3 (0.45) NPC1RAB9ASMN1; SMN2MEN1KMT2A
SCHEMBL2533142 0.76 CASP3 (0.51) NPC1RAB9ASMN1; SMN2MEN1KMT2A
SCHEMBL3721442 0.74 MET (0.70) NPC1RAB9ASMN1; SMN2MEN1KMT2A
SCHEMBL2530711 0.73 MET (0.61) NPC1RAB9AMEN1KMT2ACASP3
SCHEMBL1839889 0.73 MET (0.51) CASP3SENP8SENP7SENP6ABL1
SCHEMBL3725108 0.73 MET (0.70) NPC1RAB9ASMN1; SMN2MEN1KMT2A

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 2 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20110263593-A1 NOVEL IMIDAZO[1,2-a]PYRIMIDINE DERIVATIVES, METHOD FOR THE PREPARATION THEREOF, USE THEREOF AS MEDICAMENTS, PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS AND NOVEL USE, IN PARTICULAR AS MET INHIBITORS SANOFI-AVENTIS (FR) 2011-10-27 US claimed
US-20110263593-A1 NOVEL IMIDAZO[1,2-a]PYRIMIDINE DERIVATIVES, METHOD FOR THE PREPARATION THEREOF, USE THEREOF AS MEDICAMENTS, PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS AND NOVEL USE, IN PARTICULAR AS MET INHIBITORS SANOFI-AVENTIS (FR) 2011-10-27 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20110263593-A1 NOVEL IMIDAZO[1,2-a]PYRIMIDINE DERIVATIVES, METHOD FOR THE PREPARATION THEREOF, USE THEREOF AS MEDICAMENTS, PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS AND NOVEL USE, IN PARTICULAR AS MET INHIBITORS TPMT, MET, PAICS NPC1 1726/4885RAB9A 2193/4885SMN1; SMN2 2888/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.