SCHEMBL2543283

SCHEMBL2543283

CCN(CC)CC(=O)Nc1nc2ccc(Sc3cnc4ncccn34)cc2s1

nearest known ligand 0.41

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
RAB9A P51151 10/20 0.41
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 8/20 0.41
MAPT P10636 7/20 0.41
NPC1 O15118 7/20 0.41
HSD17B10 Q99714 2/20 0.41
KMT2A Q03164 2/20 0.41
OPRK1 P41145 2/20 0.41
PKM P14618 1/20 0.41
NPSR1 Q6W5P4 1/20 0.41
LMNA P02545 3/20 0.40
STAT1 P42224 1/20 0.40
MEN1 O00255 1/20 0.40
CYP1A2 P05177 1/20 0.40
CYP3A4 P08684 1/20 0.40
GAA P10253 1/20 0.40
CYP2D6 P10635 1/20 0.40
CYP2C9 P11712 1/20 0.40
CYP2C19 P33261 1/20 0.40
HTT P42858 3/20 0.39
TSHR P16473 1/20 0.39

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL2540705 0.88 RAB9A (0.42) RAB9ASMN1; SMN2MAPTNPC1HSD17B10
SCHEMBL2548135 0.87 MAPT (0.39) RAB9ASMN1; SMN2MAPTNPC1HSD17B10
SCHEMBL1836150 0.87 MAPT (0.42) RAB9ASMN1; SMN2MAPTNPC1HSD17B10
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL2547151 0.86 MAPT (0.42) RAB9ASMN1; SMN2MAPTNPC1HSD17B10
SCHEMBL2540801 0.86 PKM (0.36) RAB9ASMN1; SMN2MAPTNPC1KMT2A
SCHEMBL2538170 0.86 PIK3CA (0.49) RAB9ASMN1; SMN2NPC1CYP1A2CYP3A4
SCHEMBL2547102 0.85 NPC1 (0.46) RAB9ASMN1; SMN2MAPTNPC1HSD17B10
SCHEMBL1828695 0.84 MAPT (0.42) RAB9ASMN1; SMN2MAPTNPC1HSD17B10
SCHEMBL2543867 0.84 CLK1 (0.58) SMN1; SMN2MAPTKMT2ALMNAMEN1
SCHEMBL2545273 0.83 CLK1 (0.45) SMN1; SMN2MAPTKMT2ALMNAMEN1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 2 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20110263593-A1 NOVEL IMIDAZO[1,2-a]PYRIMIDINE DERIVATIVES, METHOD FOR THE PREPARATION THEREOF, USE THEREOF AS MEDICAMENTS, PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS AND NOVEL USE, IN PARTICULAR AS MET INHIBITORS SANOFI-AVENTIS (FR) 2011-10-27 US claimed
US-20110263593-A1 NOVEL IMIDAZO[1,2-a]PYRIMIDINE DERIVATIVES, METHOD FOR THE PREPARATION THEREOF, USE THEREOF AS MEDICAMENTS, PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS AND NOVEL USE, IN PARTICULAR AS MET INHIBITORS SANOFI-AVENTIS (FR) 2011-10-27 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20110263593-A1 NOVEL IMIDAZO[1,2-a]PYRIMIDINE DERIVATIVES, METHOD FOR THE PREPARATION THEREOF, USE THEREOF AS MEDICAMENTS, PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS AND NOVEL USE, IN PARTICULAR AS MET INHIBITORS TPMT, MET, PAICS RAB9A 2193/4885SMN1; SMN2 2888/4885MAPT 3670/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.