SCHEMBL25819581

SCHEMBL25819581

CCOC(=O)C1CCN(c2cccc(-c3ccc(C)nc3OCc3ccccc3)c2)CC1

nearest known ligand 0.51

Predicted protein targets (top 14)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
MAPT P10636 6/20 0.51
KDM4E B2RXH2 2/20 0.51
MEN1 O00255 2/20 0.51
KMT2A Q03164 2/20 0.51
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 2/20 0.51
PDK2 Q15119 1/20 0.47
ALDH1A1 P00352 3/20 0.47
EGFR P00533 2/20 0.46
TP53 P04637 2/20 0.46
POLB P06746 1/20 0.46
LGMN Q99538 1/20 0.46
CCR8 P51685 1/20 0.45
AURKA O14965 1/20 0.45
AURKB Q96GD4 1/20 0.45

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL25034811 0.93 MAPT (0.49) MAPTKDM4EMEN1KMT2ASMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL25935140 0.90 MAPT (0.51) MAPTKDM4EMEN1KMT2ASMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL25819440 0.87 MAPT (0.46) MAPTKDM4EMEN1KMT2ASMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL25935365 0.86 PDK2 (0.48) MAPTKDM4EMEN1KMT2ASMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL25935029 0.85 FFAR4 (0.46) MAPTKDM4EMEN1KMT2ASMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL25935354 0.84 HPGD (0.50) MAPTKDM4EMEN1KMT2ASMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL25819577 0.84 HTR1A (0.41)
SCHEMBL25819578 0.84 HTR1A (0.45)
SCHEMBL25029392 0.83 MAPT (0.49) MAPTKDM4EMEN1KMT2ASMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL30479001 0.80 MAPT (0.45) MAPTKDM4EMEN1KMT2ASMN1; SMN2

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 2 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-11912710-B2 Substituted pyrimido[4,5-b][1,4]diazepines as PLK1 degradation inducers UPPTHERA, INC. (KR) 2024-02-27 US disclosed
US-20230219966-A1 NOVEL PLK1 DEGRADATION INDUCING COMPOUND UPPTHERA, INC. (KR) 2023-07-13 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20230219966-A1 NOVEL PLK1 DEGRADATION INDUCING COMPOUND PLK1, BUB1B, BUB1 MAPT 2055/4885KDM4E 1918/4885MEN1 3403/4885
US-11912710-B2 Substituted pyrimido[4,5-b][1,4]diazepines as PLK1 degradation inducers PLK1, BUB1B, BUB1 MAPT 1700/4885KDM4E 1387/4885MEN1 2443/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.