SCHEMBL25819577

SCHEMBL25819577

Cc1ccc(-c2cccc(N3CCC(C=O)CC3)c2)c(OCc2ccccc2)n1

nearest known ligand 0.41

Predicted protein targets (top 18)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
HTR1A P08908 7/20 0.41
HTR1D P28221 6/20 0.41
HTR1B P28222 6/20 0.41
GABRG2 P18507 1/20 0.37
GABRB3 P28472 1/20 0.37
GABRA5 P31644 1/20 0.37
SQOR Q9Y6N5 1/20 0.36
HRH4 Q9H3N8 2/20 0.36
VCP P55072 1/20 0.36
CARM1 Q86X55 1/20 0.36
PRMT6 Q96LA8 1/20 0.36
PRMT8 Q9NR22 1/20 0.36
F10 P00742 1/20 0.36
HTR7 P34969 2/20 0.36
AGXT P21549 1/20 0.36
CYP4F2 P78329 1/20 0.35
CYP4A11 Q02928 1/20 0.35
GRM5 P41594 1/20 0.35

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL25034808 0.91 GRM5 (0.36) HTR1AHTR1DHTR1BSQORVCP
SCHEMBL30981151 0.91 GRM5 (0.36) HTR1AHTR1DHTR1BSQORVCP
SCHEMBL25819578 0.86 HTR1A (0.45) HTR1AHTR1DHTR1BGABRG2GABRB3
SCHEMBL25819581 0.84 MAPT (0.51)
SCHEMBL30817336 0.80 GRM5 (0.38) SQORHRH4F10GRM5
SCHEMBL25819162 0.80 CKS1B (0.47) VCP
SCHEMBL25034811 0.77 MAPT (0.49)
SCHEMBL25482345 0.77 LRRK2 (0.43) HTR1AHTR1DHTR1BGABRG2GABRB3
SCHEMBL26641363 0.76 HTR7 (0.36) HTR1AHTR1DHTR1BHRH4VCP
SCHEMBL25819197 0.76 L3MBTL1 (0.44) SQOR

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 2 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-11912710-B2 Substituted pyrimido[4,5-b][1,4]diazepines as PLK1 degradation inducers UPPTHERA, INC. (KR) 2024-02-27 US disclosed
US-20230219966-A1 NOVEL PLK1 DEGRADATION INDUCING COMPOUND UPPTHERA, INC. (KR) 2023-07-13 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20230219966-A1 NOVEL PLK1 DEGRADATION INDUCING COMPOUND PLK1, BUB1B, BUB1 HTR1A 4156/4885HTR1D 4288/4885HTR1B 4222/4885
US-11912710-B2 Substituted pyrimido[4,5-b][1,4]diazepines as PLK1 degradation inducers PLK1, BUB1B, BUB1 HTR1A 2866/4885HTR1D 3081/4885HTR1B 3067/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.