Hydrochloric Acid

Hydrochloric Acid

SCHEMBL2836487

COc1cc2ncnc([N+](C)(C)C)c2cc1OC.[Cl-]

nearest known ligand 0.50

Full drug profile on Sugi Atlas →

Known targets — ChEMBL curated mechanism

ACHEBDKRB2CHRM1CHRM2CHRM3CHRNA1CHRNB1CHRNDCHRNECHRNGGUCY1A1GUCY1A2GUCY1B1GUCY1B2NAMPTPTAFRSLC10A2SLC6A2SLC6A3TACR1dacAdacBdacCftsImrcAmrcBmrdA

The experimentally established mechanism targets of Hydrochloric Acid. The predicted profile below is derived independently by chemical similarity — agreement is a validation signal, a miss is honest.

Predicted protein targets (top 15)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
ACHE known ✓ P22303 1/20 0.48
EGFR P00533 12/20 0.50
KDR P35968 3/20 0.50
ENPP1 P22413 2/20 0.50
LCK P06239 4/20 0.49
FLT3 P36888 1/20 0.48
GAK O14976 1/20 0.48
SRC P12931 1/20 0.48
RET P07949 1/20 0.48
CLK1 P49759 1/20 0.48
ABCG2 Q9UNQ0 1/20 0.48
BACE1 P56817 1/20 0.48
JAK3 P52333 1/20 0.47
MKNK1 Q9BUB5 1/20 0.47
PDE10A Q9Y233 1/20 0.47

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL2835708 0.83 ENPP1 (0.55) EGFRENPP1
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL2833454 0.80 ENPP1 (0.57) EGFRKDRENPP1GAKSRC
SCHEMBL27816759 0.78 EGFR (0.56) EGFRKDRENPP1LCKGAK
SCHEMBL1260737 0.76 ENPP1 (0.54) EGFRKDRENPP1LCKGAK
SCHEMBL1985538 0.76 LCK (0.66) EGFRKDRENPP1LCKFLT3
SCHEMBL23726845 0.74 ENPP1 (0.53) EGFRKDRENPP1LCKGAK
SCHEMBL3166753 0.74 PDE5A (0.57) EGFRKDRENPP1LCKGAK
SCHEMBL19933282 0.74 ENPP1 (0.53) EGFRKDRENPP1LCKGAK
SCHEMBL2476964 0.74 RET (0.55) EGFRKDRENPP1LCKFLT3
SCHEMBL364049 0.74 ENPP1 (0.81) EGFRKDRENPP1LCKGAK

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 3 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
CN-101878203-A Novel 4-(tetrazol-5-yl)-quinazoline derivatives as anti cancer agents NATCO PHARMA LTD 2010-11-03 CN claimed
US-20100261740-A1 NOVEL 4-(TETRAZOL-5-YL)-QUINAZOLINE DERIVATIVES AS ANTI CANCER AGENT NATCO PHARMA LIMITED (IN) 2010-10-14 US claimed
CN-101878203-A Novel 4-(tetrazol-5-yl)-quinazoline derivatives as anti cancer agents NATCO PHARMA LTD 2010-11-03 CN disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20100261740-A1 NOVEL 4-(TETRAZOL-5-YL)-QUINAZOLINE DERIVATIVES AS ANTI CANCER AGENT MKI67, CDKL5, CCNI ACHE 3165/4885EGFR 1110/4885KDR 1689/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.