SCHEMBL2942012

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

	Compound	similarity	top predicted	shared targets
	SCHEMBL3971084	0.91	FFAR1 (0.36)	FFAR1PPARGVEGFAEGLN1
	SCHEMBL2934509	0.89	FFAR1 (0.39)	FFAR1PPARG
	SCHEMBL2937611	0.88	FFAR1 (0.35)	FFAR1PPARGVEGFAEGLN1
	SCHEMBL2941733	0.84	FFAR1 (0.42)	FFAR1PPARG
	SCHEMBL2935646	0.83	FPR1 (0.42)	FFAR1
	SCHEMBL2942154	0.81	FFAR1 (0.33)	FFAR1PPARG
	SCHEMBL2942001	0.78	FFAR1 (0.35)	FFAR1PPARGCDK2CCNE1CCNE2
	SCHEMBL2938608	0.78	AR (0.39)	FFAR1CDK2CCNE1CCNE2CDK4
	SCHEMBL2942976	0.77	MAPT (0.43)	—
	SCHEMBL2938017	0.76	FPR1 (0.39)	FFAR1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 9 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.