SCHEMBL2957578

SCHEMBL2957578

O=[Si]([O-])[O-].O=[Si]([O-])[O-].[Ca+2].[Fe+2]

nearest known ligand 0.00

Known targets — ChEMBL curated mechanism

GABBR1GABBR2GABRA1GABRA2GABRA3GABRA4GABRA5GABRA6GABRB1GABRB2GABRB3GABRDGABREGABRG1GABRG2GABRG3GABRPGABRQGRIN1GRIN2AGRIN2BGRIN2CGRIN2DGRIN3AGRIN3BHMGCRMMP1MMP13MMP7MMP8PTGS1PTGS2ileSpolrplArplBrplCrplDrplErplFrplJrplKrplLrplMrplNrplOrplPrplQrplRrplSrplTrplUrplVrplWrplXrplYrpmArpmBrpmCrpmDrpmErpmFrpmGrpmHrpmIrpmJrpsArpsBrpsCrpsDrpsErpsFrpsGrpsHrpsIrpsJrpsKrpsLrpsMrpsNrpsOrpsPrpsQrpsRrpsSrpsTrpsUykgMykgO

The experimentally established mechanism targets of None. The predicted profile below is derived independently by chemical similarity — agreement is a validation signal, a miss is honest.

⚠ Novel chemotype — no close known analogue (best Tanimoto < 0.3). Unexplored chemical space relative to ChEMBL.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL8006466 0.94
SCHEMBL11522311 0.94
SCHEMBL3577 0.94
SCHEMBL149311 0.94
SCHEMBL30507 0.94
SCHEMBL169570 0.94
SCHEMBL914234 0.88
SCHEMBL9422162 0.88
SCHEMBL15122505 0.88
SCHEMBL3247579 0.88

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 12 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-RE44850-E1 Process for copper converting OUTOTEC OYJ (FI) 2014-04-22 US claimed
US-7749301-B2 adding the Cu2S matte and flux to a calcium iron silicate agitated slag phase; injecting, from a discharge tip at the lower end of a top-submerged lance, an oxidizing gas for reacting with the matte to produce blister copper; calcium ferrite silicate have lower solubility for magnetite; no foaming AUSMELT LIMITED (AU) 2010-07-06 US claimed
EP-1759024-A4 PROCESS FOR COPPER CONVERTING AUSMELT LTD (AU) 2008-10-22 EP claimed
US-20070175299-A1 adding the Cu2S matte and flux to a calcium iron silicate agitated slag phase; injecting, from a discharge tip at the lower end of a top-submerged lance, an oxidizing gas for reacting with the matte to produce blister copper; calcium ferrite silicate have lower solubility for magnetite; no foaming AUSMELT LIMITED (AU) 2007-08-02 US claimed
EP-1759024-A1 PROCESS FOR COPPER CONVERTING AUSMELT LIMITED (AU) 2007-03-07 EP claimed
WO-2005098059-A1 PROCESS FOR COPPER CONVERTING AUSMELT LIMITED (AU) 2005-10-20 WO claimed
US-RE44850-E1 Process for copper converting OUTOTEC OYJ (FI) 2014-04-22 US disclosed
US-7749301-B2 adding the Cu2S matte and flux to a calcium iron silicate agitated slag phase; injecting, from a discharge tip at the lower end of a top-submerged lance, an oxidizing gas for reacting with the matte to produce blister copper; calcium ferrite silicate have lower solubility for magnetite; no foaming AUSMELT LIMITED (AU) 2010-07-06 US disclosed
EP-1759024-A4 PROCESS FOR COPPER CONVERTING AUSMELT LTD (AU) 2008-10-22 EP disclosed
US-20070175299-A1 adding the Cu2S matte and flux to a calcium iron silicate agitated slag phase; injecting, from a discharge tip at the lower end of a top-submerged lance, an oxidizing gas for reacting with the matte to produce blister copper; calcium ferrite silicate have lower solubility for magnetite; no foaming AUSMELT LIMITED (AU) 2007-08-02 US disclosed
EP-1759024-A1 PROCESS FOR COPPER CONVERTING AUSMELT LIMITED (AU) 2007-03-07 EP disclosed
WO-2005098059-A1 PROCESS FOR COPPER CONVERTING AUSMELT LIMITED (AU) 2005-10-20 WO disclosed