SCHEMBL2993552

SCHEMBL2993552

O=C(CN1CCOCC1)Nc1ccc(Cl)c(NC2=NC(=O)/C(=C/c3ccc4ncccc4c3)S2)c1

nearest known ligand 0.44

Predicted protein targets (top 16)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
ALDH1A1 P00352 3/20 0.44
GAA P10253 2/20 0.44
NPSR1 Q6W5P4 1/20 0.44
OGA O60502 1/20 0.43
WNT3A P56704 1/20 0.42
HPSE Q9Y251 1/20 0.41
EGFR P00533 3/20 0.40
LMNA P02545 1/20 0.40
DYRK3 O43781 1/20 0.40
APP P05067 1/20 0.39
MEN1 O00255 1/20 0.39
POLB P06746 1/20 0.39
CLK1 P49759 1/20 0.39
KMT2A Q03164 1/20 0.39
JAK3 P52333 2/20 0.38
HPGD P15428 1/20 0.38

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL2993556 1.00 ALDH1A1 (0.44) ALDH1A1GAANPSR1OGAWNT3A
Trifluoroacetic Acid SCHEMBL4095080 0.95 WNT3A (0.40) ALDH1A1GAANPSR1OGAWNT3A
Trifluoroacetic Acid SCHEMBL4095073 0.95 WNT3A (0.40) ALDH1A1GAANPSR1OGAWNT3A
SCHEMBL2985521 0.94 OGA (0.43) ALDH1A1OGAEGFRDYRK3CLK1
SCHEMBL2985523 0.94 OGA (0.43) ALDH1A1OGAEGFRDYRK3CLK1
SCHEMBL3641881 0.93 OGA (0.42) OGAHPSEEGFRDYRK3CLK1
SCHEMBL3641882 0.93 OGA (0.42) OGAHPSEEGFRDYRK3CLK1
SCHEMBL2991247 0.92 OGA (0.42) ALDH1A1GAAOGALMNADYRK3
SCHEMBL2991245 0.92 OGA (0.42) ALDH1A1GAAOGALMNADYRK3
SCHEMBL4952631 0.91 OGA (0.43) ALDH1A1GAAOGALMNADYRK3

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 7 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20090203692-A1 NOVEL CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION 2009-08-13 US claimed
EP-1885362-A2 NOVEL CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS Smithkline Beecham Corporation (US) 2008-02-13 EP claimed
WO-2006127458-A2 NOVEL CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION (US) 2006-11-30 WO claimed
US-20100184774-A1 METHODS OF TREATMENT SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION 2010-07-22 US disclosed
EP-2164494-A1 METHODS OF TREATMENT GlaxoSmithKline LLC (US) 2010-03-24 EP disclosed
US-20090203692-A1 NOVEL CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION 2009-08-13 US disclosed
WO-2008150837-A1 METHODS OF TREATMENT SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION (US) 2008-12-11 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20100184774-A1 METHODS OF TREATMENT OPRL1, BRCA1, PKD1 ALDH1A1 2461/4885GAA 139/4885NPSR1 4/4885
US-20090203692-A1 NOVEL CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS HIPK3, HIPK1, HIPK4 ALDH1A1 4089/4885GAA 244/4885NPSR1 4513/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.