SCHEMBL3047157

SCHEMBL3047157

O=Cc1ccc(-c2cc3c(cc2C(F)(F)F)ncn3C(c2ccccc2)(c2ccccc2)c2ccccc2)cc1

nearest known ligand 0.40

Predicted protein targets (top 19)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
AKR1C3 P42330 1/20 0.40
AKR1C2 P52895 1/20 0.40
KIF11 P52732 1/20 0.38
DRD1 P21728 3/20 0.34
DRD2 P14416 1/20 0.34
DRD4 P21917 1/20 0.34
DRD5 P21918 1/20 0.34
DRD3 P35462 1/20 0.34
HDAC11 Q96DB2 1/20 0.33
GRM5 P41594 1/20 0.33
POLB P06746 2/20 0.32
ALDH1A1 P00352 2/20 0.32
L3MBTL1 Q9Y468 1/20 0.32
FGFR1 P11362 1/20 0.32
HCAR1 Q9BXC0 1/20 0.31
KDM4E B2RXH2 1/20 0.31
TOP1 P11387 1/20 0.30
TP53 P04637 1/20 0.30
MAPT P10636 1/20 0.30

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL3048493 0.97 AKR1C3 (0.41) AKR1C3AKR1C2KIF11DRD1DRD2
SCHEMBL3046969 0.86 DRD1 (0.35) AKR1C3AKR1C2KIF11DRD1DRD2
SCHEMBL3047005 0.84 ALDH1A1 (0.35) DRD1DRD2DRD4DRD5DRD3
SCHEMBL3044219 0.84 DRD1 (0.35) AKR1C3AKR1C2KIF11DRD1DRD2
SCHEMBL3050411 0.82 FGFR1 (0.33) DRD1DRD2DRD4DRD5DRD3
SCHEMBL3044679 0.81 FGFR1 (0.45) DRD1DRD2DRD4DRD5DRD3
SCHEMBL3038570 0.80 FGFR1 (0.39) KIF11DRD1POLBALDH1A1FGFR1
SCHEMBL3044076 0.80 KDR (0.40) KIF11DRD1POLBALDH1A1FGFR1
SCHEMBL3047110 0.79 FGFR1 (0.42) DRD1DRD2DRD4DRD5DRD3
SCHEMBL6489900 0.78 FGFR1 (0.45) POLBALDH1A1FGFR1KDM4E

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 1 patent. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20100222345-A1 NOVEL COMPOUNDS AS ANTAGONISTS OR INVERSE AGONISTS FOR OPIOID RECEPTORS SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION 2010-09-02 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20100222345-A1 NOVEL COMPOUNDS AS ANTAGONISTS OR INVERSE AGONISTS FOR OPIOID RECEPTORS OPRL1, OPRM1, OPRK1 AKR1C3 2350/4885AKR1C2 2236/4885KIF11 3026/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.