SCHEMBL30762013

SCHEMBL30762013

O=[N+]([O-])c1ccc2c(c1)C(F)NC2

nearest known ligand 0.54

Predicted protein targets (top 4)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
PNMT P11086 11/20 0.54
ADRA2A P08913 7/20 0.54
ADRA2B P18089 3/20 0.54
ADRA2C P18825 3/20 0.54

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL19583533 0.77 PNMT (0.50) PNMTADRA2AADRA2BADRA2C
SCHEMBL29897771 0.77 PNMT (0.50) PNMTADRA2AADRA2BADRA2C
SCHEMBL27961755 0.74 PNMT (0.47) PNMTADRA2AADRA2BADRA2C
SCHEMBL9277382 0.72 PNMT (0.51) PNMTADRA2AADRA2BADRA2C
SCHEMBL19035841 0.70 PNMT (1.00) PNMTADRA2AADRA2BADRA2C
SCHEMBL4164273 0.70 PNMT (0.88) PNMTADRA2AADRA2BADRA2C
SCHEMBL7512740 0.70 PNMT (1.00) PNMTADRA2AADRA2BADRA2C
SCHEMBL22271652 0.69 PNMT (0.55) PNMTADRA2AADRA2BADRA2C
SCHEMBL1013537 0.69 ALDH1A1 (0.52) PNMTADRA2AADRA2BADRA2C
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL7511868 0.69 PNMT (0.97) PNMTADRA2AADRA2BADRA2C

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 4 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20250235456-A1 METHODS OF USE FOR AZA-QUINAZOLINE COMPOUNDS IAMBIC THERAPEUTICS, INC. 2025-07-24 US disclosed
EP-4558502-A1 AZA-QUINAZOLINE COMPOUNDS AND METHODS OF USE Iambic Therapeutics, Inc. (US) 2025-05-28 EP disclosed
US-20240034731-A1 AZA-QUINAZOLINE COMPOUNDS AND METHODS OF USE IAMBIC THERAPEUTICS, INC. 2024-02-01 US disclosed
WO-2024020419-A1 AZA-QUINAZOLINE COMPOUNDS AND METHODS OF USE IAMBIC THERAPEUTICS, INC. (US) 2024-01-25 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20240034731-A1 AZA-QUINAZOLINE COMPOUNDS AND METHODS OF USE CCNI, CDKN1A, CDK8 PNMT 1213/4885ADRA2A 2431/4885ADRA2B 2001/4885
US-20250235456-A1 METHODS OF USE FOR AZA-QUINAZOLINE COMPOUNDS AZI2, TPMT, HDAC10 PNMT 821/4885ADRA2A 628/4885ADRA2B 524/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.