SCHEMBL318237

SCHEMBL318237

CC(C)(C)OC(=O)C(c1ccccc1)N1CN(c2ccccc2)C2(CCN(CCCN3C(=O)Cc4ccccc43)CC2)C1=O

nearest known ligand 0.44

Predicted protein targets (top 12)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
DRD2 P14416 7/20 0.44
DRD3 P35462 7/20 0.44
HTR7 P34969 6/20 0.44
DRD5 P21918 4/20 0.44
HTR1A P08908 1/20 0.44
DRD4 P21917 3/20 0.42
HTR2A P28223 1/20 0.42
OPRM1 P35372 1/20 0.40
OPRD1 P41143 1/20 0.40
OPRK1 P41145 1/20 0.40
OPRL1 P41146 1/20 0.40
CCR5 P51681 1/20 0.39

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL318238 1.00 DRD2 (0.44) DRD2DRD3HTR7DRD5HTR1A
SCHEMBL318659 1.00 DRD2 (0.44) DRD2DRD3HTR7DRD5HTR1A
SCHEMBL318748 0.89 DRD2 (0.50) DRD2DRD3HTR7DRD5HTR1A
SCHEMBL318904 0.89 DRD2 (0.50) DRD2DRD3HTR7DRD5HTR1A
SCHEMBL318271 0.84 DRD2 (0.58) DRD2DRD3HTR7HTR1ADRD4
SCHEMBL318241 0.84 DRD2 (0.58) DRD2DRD3HTR7HTR1ADRD4
SCHEMBL318242 0.84 DRD2 (0.58) DRD2DRD3HTR7HTR1ADRD4
SCHEMBL18602024 0.81 HTR7 (0.50) DRD2DRD3HTR7DRD5HTR1A
SCHEMBL318945 0.79 OPRM1 (0.51) OPRM1OPRD1OPRK1OPRL1
SCHEMBL318770 0.79 HTR7 (0.43) DRD2DRD3HTR7DRD5HTR1A

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 6 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
EP-3138841-A1 D2 ANTAGONISTS, METHODS OF SYNTHESIS AND METHODS OF USE Altos Therapeutics, LLC (US) 2017-03-08 EP disclosed
US-9156840-B2 D2 antagonists, methods of synthesis and methods of use Altos Therapeutics, LLC (US) 2015-10-13 US disclosed
US-20140350005-A1 D2 ANTAGONISTS, METHODS OF SYNTHESIS AND METHODS OF USE TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY LIMITED (JP) 2014-11-27 US disclosed
EP-2582701-A1 D2 ANTAGONISTS, METHODS OF SYNTHESIS AND METHODS OF USE Altos Therapeutics, LLC (US) 2013-04-24 EP disclosed
US-20120010228-A1 D2 ANTAGONISTS, METHODS OF SYNTHESIS AND METHODS OF USE Altos Therapeutics, LLC 2012-01-12 US disclosed
WO-2011160084-A1 D2 ANTAGONISTS, METHODS OF SYNTHESIS AND METHODS OF USE Altos Therapeutics, LLC (US) 2011-12-22 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20140350005-A1 D2 ANTAGONISTS, METHODS OF SYNTHESIS AND METHODS OF USE DRD2, DRD3, AVPR2 DRD2 1/4885DRD3 2/4885HTR7 171/4885
US-20120010228-A1 D2 ANTAGONISTS, METHODS OF SYNTHESIS AND METHODS OF USE DRD2, DRD3, AVPR2 DRD2 1/4885DRD3 2/4885HTR7 171/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.