SCHEMBL3208573

SCHEMBL3208573

CCCC[Sn](CCCC)(CCCC)c1cncc(C(=O)OC)c1

nearest known ligand 0.50

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
ATM Q13315 1/20 0.50
CYP2C19 P33261 2/20 0.40
CYP2A6 P11509 1/20 0.40
CYP2C9 P11712 1/20 0.40
ALDH1A1 P00352 3/20 0.40
CYP11B1 P15538 2/20 0.39
CYP11B2 P19099 2/20 0.39
NPC1 O15118 1/20 0.39
CASP1 P29466 1/20 0.39
RAB9A P51151 1/20 0.39
L3MBTL1 Q9Y468 2/20 0.38
KDM4E B2RXH2 2/20 0.38
HPGD P15428 1/20 0.38
MAPT P10636 1/20 0.38
S1PR1 P21453 1/20 0.37
CYP1A2 P05177 1/20 0.36
CYP3A4 P08684 1/20 0.36
LMNA P02545 1/20 0.35
GRM5 P41594 1/20 0.35
MGLL Q99685 1/20 0.35

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL9194946 0.94 MAPT (0.46) ATMCYP2C19L3MBTL1KDM4EMAPT
SCHEMBL5791367 0.84 CYP2C9 (0.46) CYP2C19CYP2C9ALDH1A1KDM4ELMNA
SCHEMBL6570768 0.83 KDM4E (0.44) CYP2C19ALDH1A1NPC1CASP1RAB9A
SCHEMBL8979701 0.82 MKNK1 (0.37) CYP11B1CYP11B2NPC1RAB9AKDM4E
SCHEMBL9349704 0.80 CYP2C9 (0.34) ATMCYP2C19CYP2C9L3MBTL1MAPT
SCHEMBL6570774 0.78 PLA2G2A (0.41) ALDH1A1NPC1CASP1RAB9AL3MBTL1
SCHEMBL5952565 0.77 NPC1 (0.50) ALDH1A1NPC1CASP1RAB9AL3MBTL1
SCHEMBL9199886 0.77 KDM4E (0.46) CYP2C19ALDH1A1NPC1RAB9AL3MBTL1
SCHEMBL12502665 0.74 CYP11B1 (0.35) CYP2C9CYP11B1CYP11B2CYP1A2CYP3A4
SCHEMBL56951 0.74 ATM (0.77) ATMCYP2C19CYP2A6CYP2C9ALDH1A1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 6 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20100048606-A1 10-Substituted Cytisine Derivatives and Methods of Use Thereof Georgetown University Office of Technology Commercialization (US) 2010-02-25 US disclosed
WO-2007115092-A2 10-SUBSTITUTED CYTISINE DERIVATIVES AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY (US) 2007-10-11 WO disclosed
US-5502065-A TREATING HEADACHES PFIZER INC. (US) 1996-03-26 US disclosed
EP-0636129-A1 INDOLE DERIVATIVES AS 5-HT1-LIKE AGONISTS Pfizer Limited (GB) 1995-02-01 EP disclosed
CN-1082040-A Indoles PFIZER RES & DEV (IE) 1994-02-16 CN disclosed
WO-1993021178-A1 INDOLE DERIVATIVES AS 5-HT1-LIKE AGONISTS PFIZER LIMITED (GB) 1993-10-28 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20100048606-A1 10-Substituted Cytisine Derivatives and Methods of Use Thereof CHRNA10, CHRNA5, CHRNA1 ATM 3508/4885CYP2C19 664/4885CYP2A6 899/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.