SCHEMBL3244501

SCHEMBL3244501

COc1ccc(OBOc2ccc(OC)c(C34CC5CC(CC(C5)C3)C4)c2)cc1C12CC3CC(CC(C3)C1)C2

nearest known ligand 0.51

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
LMNA P02545 4/20 0.51
KMT2A Q03164 4/20 0.51
RARA P10276 3/20 0.51
RARB P10826 3/20 0.51
RARG P13631 3/20 0.51
TDP1 Q9NUW8 2/20 0.51
MEN1 O00255 2/20 0.51
NR1I2 O75469 1/20 0.51
PGR P06401 1/20 0.51
HSPD1 P10809 1/20 0.51
GOT1 P17174 1/20 0.51
GLRA1 P23415 1/20 0.51
BLM P54132 1/20 0.51
HSPE1 P61604 1/20 0.51
ALDH1A1 P00352 2/20 0.47
KDM4E B2RXH2 1/20 0.47
ALOX12 P18054 1/20 0.47
HTT P42858 1/20 0.47
HDAC11 Q96DB2 2/20 0.46
HDAC2 Q92769 1/20 0.46

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL5828881 0.85 RARA (0.42) LMNAKMT2ARARARARBRARG
SCHEMBL5828207 0.80 RARA (0.35) LMNAKMT2ARARARARBRARG
SCHEMBL27977250 0.80 RARA (0.52) LMNAKMT2ARARARARBRARG
SCHEMBL31150999 0.80 RARA (0.52) LMNAKMT2ARARARARBRARG
SCHEMBL641031 0.80 RARB (0.67) LMNAKMT2ARARARARBRARG
SCHEMBL8839170 0.79 KMT2A (0.57) LMNAKMT2ARARARARBRARG
SCHEMBL10014917 0.78 RARA (0.52) LMNAKMT2ARARARARBRARG
SCHEMBL3690282 0.77 KMT2A (0.51) LMNAKMT2ARARARARBRARG
SCHEMBL8424855 0.77 RARA (0.54) LMNAKMT2ARARARARBRARG
SCHEMBL3690283 0.77 KMT2A (0.51) LMNAKMT2ARARARARBRARG

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 7 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
EP-2210869-A1 New method for the preparation of 6-[3-(1-adamantyl)-4-methoxyphenyl]-2-naphthoic acid Galderma Research & Development (FR) 2010-07-28 EP claimed
WO-2008126104-A2 NOVEL PROCESS FOR PREPARATION OF ADAPALENE INDOCO REMEDIES LIMITED (IN) 2008-10-23 WO disclosed
US-7153875-B2 Heterocyclic derivatives for the treatment of cancer and other proliferative diseases INCYTE SAN DIEGO (US) 2006-12-26 US disclosed
EP-1385465-A4 HETEROCYCLIC DERIVATIVES FOR THE TREATMENT OF CANCER AND OTHER PROLIFERATIVE DISEASES INCYTE SAN DIEGO INC (US) 2005-09-07 EP disclosed
EP-1385465-A2 HETEROCYCLIC DERIVATIVES FOR THE TREATMENT OF CANCER AND OTHER PROLIFERATIVE DISEASES Incyte San Diego, Inc. (US) 2004-02-04 EP disclosed
US-20020143182-A1 Heterocyclic derivatives for the treatment of cancer and other proliferative diseases INCYTE GENOMICS, INC. 2002-10-03 US disclosed
WO-2002072009-A2 HETEROCYCLIC DERIVATIVES FOR THE TREATMENT OF CANCER AND OTHER PROLIFERATIVE DISEASES MAXIA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. (US) 2002-09-19 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20020143182-A1 Heterocyclic derivatives for the treatment of cancer and other proliferative diseases CCNY, HRAS, AHR LMNA 2333/4885KMT2A 815/4885RARA 1460/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.