SCHEMBL3345482

SCHEMBL3345482

O=C(Nc1cccc(-c2ccc(CNC3Cc4ccccc4C3)cn2)c1)C(F)(F)F

nearest known ligand 0.45

Predicted protein targets (top 16)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
NPC1 O15118 2/20 0.45
RAB9A P51151 2/20 0.45
PAX8 Q06710 2/20 0.45
MEN1 O00255 1/20 0.44
HSP90AA1 P07900 1/20 0.44
KMT2A Q03164 1/20 0.44
MTTP P55157 4/20 0.43
APOB P04114 2/20 0.43
SMO Q99835 8/20 0.42
HDAC1 Q13547 1/20 0.41
SLC2A1 P11166 1/20 0.41
TP53 P04637 1/20 0.41
MAPT P10636 1/20 0.41
FGFR3 P22607 2/20 0.41
KDR P35968 2/20 0.41
KDM1A O60341 1/20 0.40

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL3345320 0.84 NPC1 (0.47) NPC1RAB9APAX8MEN1HSP90AA1
Trifluoroacetic Acid SCHEMBL3345474 0.82 SLC2A1 (0.46) MTTPAPOBHDAC1SLC2A1KDM1A
SCHEMBL3339104 0.82 HDAC1 (0.51) NPC1RAB9APAX8MEN1HSP90AA1
SCHEMBL12651277 0.80 KDM1A (0.50) HDAC1FGFR3KDRKDM1A
Trifluoroacetic Acid SCHEMBL16195088 0.70 SLC2A1 (0.53) RAB9AMEN1KMT2AMTTPAPOB
Trifluoroacetic Acid SCHEMBL3337454 0.70 SLC2A1 (0.55) RAB9AMEN1KMT2AMTTPAPOB
SCHEMBL13137147 0.69 GRIN2B (0.39) RAB9AMEN1KMT2AHDAC1
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL3159892 0.69 GRIN2B (0.38) RAB9AMEN1KMT2AHDAC1
Trifluoroacetic Acid SCHEMBL1790201 0.68 SLC2A1 (0.58) RAB9AMEN1KMT2AMTTPAPOB
Trifluoroacetic Acid SCHEMBL3342448 0.68 SLC2A1 (0.53) RAB9AMEN1KMT2AMTTPAPOB

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 2 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20140323487-A1 Novel Compounds As Antagonists Or Inverse Agonists At Opioid Receptors GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC 2014-10-30 US disclosed
US-20100113512-A1 METHOD OF TREATMENT USING NOVEL ANTAGONISTS OR INVERSE AGONISTS AT OPIOID RECEPTORS IGNAR DIANE MICHELE 2010-05-06 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20100113512-A1 METHOD OF TREATMENT USING NOVEL ANTAGONISTS OR INVERSE AGONISTS AT OPIOID RECEPTORS OPRL1, OPRD1, OPRK1 NPC1 3112/4885RAB9A 2340/4885PAX8 1560/4885
US-20140323487-A1 Novel Compounds As Antagonists Or Inverse Agonists At Opioid Receptors OPRL1, OPRM1, OPRK1 NPC1 3467/4885RAB9A 1186/4885PAX8 939/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.