SCHEMBL3389679

SCHEMBL3389679

N#Cc1ccnc(C2CC(c3cc(C#N)ccn3)CC(c3cc(C#N)ccn3)C2)c1

nearest known ligand 0.42

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
CHRNA1 P02708 1/20 0.42
CHRNG P07510 1/20 0.42
CHRNB1 P11230 1/20 0.42
CHRNB2 P17787 1/20 0.42
CHRNB4 P30926 1/20 0.42
CHRNA3 P32297 1/20 0.42
CHRNA4 P43681 1/20 0.42
CHRND Q07001 1/20 0.42
CLK4 Q9HAZ1 1/20 0.38
NPY5R Q15761 6/20 0.37
KCNH2 Q12809 4/20 0.37
KDM1A O60341 2/20 0.36
MAP3K12 Q12852 4/20 0.36
KDM4C Q9H3R0 1/20 0.35
MAOA P21397 1/20 0.35
USP30 Q70CQ3 1/20 0.34
ROCK2 O75116 1/20 0.34
EGLN2 Q96KS0 2/20 0.33
DRD2 P14416 1/20 0.33
DRD3 P35462 1/20 0.33

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL3394052 1.00 CHRNA1 (0.42) CHRNA1CHRNGCHRNB1CHRNB2CHRNB4
SCHEMBL16094779 0.89 MAP3K12 (0.43) CLK4NPY5RKCNH2MAP3K12USP30
SCHEMBL13738629 0.85 CTSK (0.41) MAP3K12USP30DRD2DRD3
SCHEMBL27454689 0.85 CLK4 (0.40) CHRNA1CHRNGCHRNB1CHRNB2CHRNB4
SCHEMBL22637348 0.85 DRD2 (0.41) MAP3K12USP30DRD2DRD3
SCHEMBL13496621 0.84 CTSK (0.43) KCNH2MAP3K12MAOAUSP30DRD2
SCHEMBL3230699 0.79 MAP3K12 (0.53) MAP3K12EGLN2
SCHEMBL9792784 0.74 NPY5R (0.45) CLK4NPY5RKCNH2KDM4CUSP30
SCHEMBL29500425 0.74 NPY5R (0.45) CLK4NPY5RKCNH2KDM4CUSP30
SCHEMBL5564307 0.72 CLK4 (0.53) CLK4KDM1AUSP30

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 5 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-8716472-B2 Tripodal cyclohexane derivatives and their use as carbohydrate receptors UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER (US) 2014-05-06 US claimed
US-20100041568-A1 TRIPODAL CYCLOHEXANE DERIVATIVES AND THEIR USE AS CARBOHYDRATE RECEPTORS UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER (US) 2010-02-18 US claimed
US-8716472-B2 Tripodal cyclohexane derivatives and their use as carbohydrate receptors UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER (US) 2014-05-06 US disclosed
US-20100041568-A1 TRIPODAL CYCLOHEXANE DERIVATIVES AND THEIR USE AS CARBOHYDRATE RECEPTORS UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER (US) 2010-02-18 US disclosed
WO-2008048967-A1 TRIPODAL CYCLOHEXANE DERIVATIVES AND THEIR USE AS CARBOHYDRATE RECEPTORS UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER (US) 2008-04-24 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20100041568-A1 TRIPODAL CYCLOHEXANE DERIVATIVES AND THEIR USE AS CARBOHYDRATE RECEPTORS CA14, HCAR1, CCKAR CHRNA1 1108/4885CHRNG 458/4885CHRNB1 1200/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.