SCHEMBL3534872

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

	Compound	similarity	top predicted	shared targets
	SCHEMBL3538400	0.88	PTGER4 (1.00)	PTGER4
	SCHEMBL3536303	0.86	PTGER4 (0.82)	PTGER4
	SCHEMBL4687696	0.85	PTGER4 (0.57)	PTGER4MMP2MMP1MMP3MMP9
	SCHEMBL3532300	0.82	PTGER4 (1.00)	PTGER4
	SCHEMBL3537655	0.79	PTGER4 (0.82)	PTGER4
	SCHEMBL3537874	0.73	PTGER4 (0.76)	PTGER4MMP2MMP1MMP3MMP9
	SCHEMBL3534956	0.73	PTGER4 (0.69)	PTGER4
	SCHEMBL3533979	0.73	PTGER4 (0.71)	PTGER4
	SCHEMBL4690516	0.73	PTGER4 (0.72)	PTGER4MMP13
	SCHEMBL3534028	0.72	PTGER4 (1.00)	PTGER4

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 27 patents — showing the first 20. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (4 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.