SCHEMBL3537525

SCHEMBL3537525

CC1(C)CC(O)(C(F)(F)F)C(Nc2cccc3ccccc23)c2cccc(O)c21

nearest known ligand 0.55

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
NR3C1 P04150 8/20 0.55
PGR P06401 3/20 0.55
AR P10275 2/20 0.55
KDM4E B2RXH2 6/20 0.38
ALDH1A1 P00352 3/20 0.38
HPGD P15428 2/20 0.38
HSD17B10 Q99714 2/20 0.38
APAF1 O14727 1/20 0.38
NSD2 O96028 1/20 0.38
CASP3 P42574 1/20 0.38
SENP8 Q96LD8 1/20 0.38
SENP7 Q9BQF6 1/20 0.38
SENP6 Q9GZR1 1/20 0.38
MAPT P10636 3/20 0.36
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 1/20 0.34
MEN1 O00255 1/20 0.32
KMT2A Q03164 1/20 0.32
NPC1 O15118 1/20 0.32
RXFP1 Q9HBX9 1/20 0.32
CYP1A2 P05177 3/20 0.32

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL3535475 0.82 NR3C1 (0.60) NR3C1PGRAR
SCHEMBL3535647 0.82 NR3C1 (0.55) NR3C1PGRAR
SCHEMBL3539690 0.82 NR3C1 (0.42) NR3C1PGRARKDM4EMAPT
SCHEMBL3535385 0.81 NR3C1 (0.53) NR3C1PGRAR
SCHEMBL3532598 0.81 NR3C1 (0.80) NR3C1PGRAR
SCHEMBL331942 0.81 NR3C1 (0.54) NR3C1PGRARKDM4EALDH1A1
SCHEMBL3532110 0.81 NR3C1 (0.48) NR3C1PGRAR
SCHEMBL3529582 0.80 NR3C1 (0.60) NR3C1PGRAR
SCHEMBL332399 0.80 NR3C1 (0.53) NR3C1PGRARKDM4EALDH1A1
SCHEMBL3245824 0.79 NR3C1 (0.50) NR3C1PGRARKDM4EALDH1A1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 9 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-7662821-B2 improved selectivity and pharmacokinetic properties; 6-Fluoro-1-[(1 H-indazol-4-yl)amino]-4,4-dimethyl-2-(trifluoromethyl)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalene-2,5-diol; cyclization of imines BAYER SCHERING PHARMA AG (DE) 2010-02-16 US claimed
US-7638515-B2 improved selectivity and pharmacokinetic properties; 6-Fluoro-1-[(1 H-indazol-4-yl)amino]-4,4-dimethyl-2-(trifluoromethyl)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalene-2,5-diol; cyclization of imines BAYER SCHERING PHARMA AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT (DE) 2009-12-29 US claimed
US-7662821-B2 improved selectivity and pharmacokinetic properties; 6-Fluoro-1-[(1 H-indazol-4-yl)amino]-4,4-dimethyl-2-(trifluoromethyl)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalene-2,5-diol; cyclization of imines BAYER SCHERING PHARMA AG (DE) 2010-02-16 US disclosed
US-7659297-B2 improved selectivity and pharmacokinetic properties; 6-Fluoro-1-[(1 H-indazol-4-yl)amino]-4,4-dimethyl-2-(trifluoromethyl)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalene-2,5-diol; cyclization of imines Bayer Schering Pharma, AG (DE) 2010-02-09 US disclosed
US-7638515-B2 improved selectivity and pharmacokinetic properties; 6-Fluoro-1-[(1 H-indazol-4-yl)amino]-4,4-dimethyl-2-(trifluoromethyl)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalene-2,5-diol; cyclization of imines BAYER SCHERING PHARMA AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT (DE) 2009-12-29 US disclosed
EP-1670458-B1 1-AMINO-2-OXY-SUBSTITUTED TETRAHYDRONAPHTALENE DERIVATIVES, METHODS FOR THE PRODUCTION THEREOF, AND THEIR USE AS ANTIPHLOGISTICS SCHERING AG (DE) 2006-12-20 EP disclosed
US-20050272823-A1 Tetrahydronaphthalene derivatives, process for their production and their use as anti-inflammatory agents BAYER SCHERING PHARMA AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT (DE) 2005-12-08 US disclosed
US-20050209324-A1 Tetrahydronaphthalene derivatives, process for their production and their use as anti-inflammatory agents BAYER SCHERING PHARMA AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT (DE) 2005-09-22 US disclosed
US-20050171109-A1 Tetrahydronaphthalene derivatives, process for their production and their use as anti-inflammatory agents BAYER SCHERING PHARMA AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT (DE) 2005-08-04 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (3 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20050171109-A1 Tetrahydronaphthalene derivatives, process for their production and their use as anti-inflammatory agents TNF, DHPS, PTGES NR3C1 1387/4885PGR 3963/4885AR 3697/4885
US-20050272823-A1 Tetrahydronaphthalene derivatives, process for their production and their use as anti-inflammatory agents DHPS, TNF, PTGES NR3C1 1000/4885PGR 3505/4885AR 3564/4885
US-20050209324-A1 Tetrahydronaphthalene derivatives, process for their production and their use as anti-inflammatory agents TNF, DHPS, PTGES NR3C1 1387/4885PGR 3963/4885AR 3697/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.