SCHEMBL3596956

SCHEMBL3596956

CCOC(=O)c1c(C)c(C(=O)c2ccc(C(=O)OC)cc2)n2ccccc12

nearest known ligand 0.59

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
MAPT P10636 4/20 0.52
ALDH1A1 P00352 7/20 0.50
MEN1 O00255 5/20 0.50
KMT2A Q03164 5/20 0.50
HPGD P15428 3/20 0.50
NPSR1 Q6W5P4 1/20 0.50
KDM4E B2RXH2 5/20 0.49
MAPK1 P28482 2/20 0.48
CYP1A2 P05177 2/20 0.48
CYP3A4 P08684 2/20 0.48
IDO1 P14902 1/20 0.48
HBB P68871 1/20 0.48
HIF1A Q16665 1/20 0.48
HTT P42858 3/20 0.47
LMNA P02545 1/20 0.47
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 1/20 0.47
GAA P10253 2/20 0.44
GLA P06280 1/20 0.44
CYP2D6 P10635 1/20 0.44
CYP2C9 P11712 1/20 0.44

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL6218548 0.87 MEN1 (0.56) MAPTALDH1A1MEN1KMT2AHPGD
SCHEMBL3600585 0.82 NPC1 (0.44) MAPTALDH1A1MEN1KMT2AHPGD
SCHEMBL3597834 0.82 HTT (0.52) MAPTALDH1A1MEN1KMT2AHPGD
SCHEMBL3597806 0.81 MAPT (0.48) MAPTALDH1A1MEN1KMT2AHPGD
SCHEMBL3608384 0.81 HTT (0.51) MAPTALDH1A1MEN1KMT2AHPGD
SCHEMBL3593263 0.80 MAPT (0.43) MAPTALDH1A1MEN1KMT2AHPGD
SCHEMBL3611572 0.79 ALDH1A1 (0.49) MAPTALDH1A1MEN1KMT2AHPGD
SCHEMBL3594590 0.76 LMNA (0.50) MAPTALDH1A1MEN1KMT2AHPGD
SCHEMBL8325573 0.76 ALDH1A1 (0.55) MAPTALDH1A1MEN1KMT2AHPGD
SCHEMBL29059749 0.76 ALDH1A1 (0.49) MAPTALDH1A1MEN1KMT2AHPGD

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 4 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-7803811-B2 1,2,3-substituted indolizine derivatives, inhibitors of FGFs, method for preparing them and pharmaceutical compositions containing them SANOFI-AVENTIS (FR) 2010-09-28 US disclosed
US-20090023770-A1 Novel 1,2,3-Substituted Indolizine Derivatives, Inhibitors of FGFs, Method for Preparing Them and Pharmaceutical Compositions Containing Them SANOFI-AVENTIS (FR) 2009-01-22 US disclosed
US-7442708-B2 1,2,3-substituted indolizine derivatives, inhibitors of fgfs, method for making same and pharmaceutical compositions containing same SANOFI-AVENTIS (FR) 2008-10-28 US disclosed
US-20050203126-A1 Novel 1,2,3-substituted indolizine derivatives, inhibitors of fgfs, method for making same and pharmaceutical compositions containing same SANOFI (FR) 2005-09-15 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20050203126-A1 Novel 1,2,3-substituted indolizine derivatives, inhibitors of fgfs, method for making same and pharmaceutical compositions containing same FGFR3, FGFR1, NTRK3 MAPT 4109/4885ALDH1A1 1784/4885MEN1 1974/4885
US-20090023770-A1 Novel 1,2,3-Substituted Indolizine Derivatives, Inhibitors of FGFs, Method for Preparing Them and Pharmaceutical Compositions Containing Them FGF2, FGF1, FGFR1 MAPT 2866/4885ALDH1A1 1502/4885MEN1 1481/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.