SCHEMBL3669236

SCHEMBL3669236

NC(=O)c1ccccc1OC(F)(F)C(F)C(F)(F)F

nearest known ligand 0.49

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
IRAK4 Q9NWZ3 1/20 0.49
HTT P42858 2/20 0.47
CTNNB1 P35222 1/20 0.46
ALDH1A1 P00352 2/20 0.45
TSHR P16473 2/20 0.45
HSD17B10 Q99714 2/20 0.45
RECQL P46063 1/20 0.43
MAPT P10636 4/20 0.40
MEN1 O00255 3/20 0.40
KMT2A Q03164 3/20 0.40
USP2 O75604 1/20 0.40
ALOX15 P16050 1/20 0.40
KDM4E B2RXH2 2/20 0.40
PARP1 P09874 2/20 0.40
LMNA P02545 2/20 0.40
NR1I2 O75469 1/20 0.40
CHRM2 P08172 1/20 0.40
CYP3A4 P08684 1/20 0.40
ADRA2A P08913 1/20 0.40
OPRK1 P41145 1/20 0.40

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL3548983 0.89 IRAK4 (0.53) IRAK4HTTCTNNB1ALDH1A1TSHR
SCHEMBL4432486 0.86 ALDH1A1 (0.54) HTTALDH1A1TSHRHSD17B10RECQL
SCHEMBL2940312 0.84 TSHR (0.45) IRAK4ALDH1A1TSHRHSD17B10RECQL
SCHEMBL9718890 0.82 TSHR (0.50) ALDH1A1TSHRHSD17B10RECQLMAPT
SCHEMBL351860 0.80 CTNNB1 (0.55) IRAK4HTTCTNNB1ALDH1A1TSHR
SCHEMBL29710969 0.80 CTNNB1 (0.55) IRAK4HTTCTNNB1ALDH1A1TSHR
SCHEMBL7751671 0.79 ALDH1A1 (0.46) ALDH1A1TSHRHSD17B10RECQLMAPT
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL4379608 0.78 CTNNB1 (0.53) IRAK4HTTCTNNB1ALDH1A1TSHR
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL1267297 0.78 CTNNB1 (0.53) IRAK4HTTCTNNB1ALDH1A1TSHR
SCHEMBL14722655 0.78 IRAK4 (0.49) IRAK4HTTCTNNB1ALDH1A1TSHR

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 9 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
EP-2150113-A1 FUNGICIDAL COMPOSITIONS Syngeta Participations AG (CH) 2010-02-10 EP claimed
US-20090011935-A1 Method of Inducing Tolerance of Plants Against Bacterioses BASF SE (DE) 2009-01-08 US claimed
EP-1996018-A2 METHOD OF INDUCING TOLERANCE OF PLANTS AGAINST BACTERIOSES BASF SE (DE) 2008-12-03 EP claimed
WO-2008131901-A1 FUNGICIDAL COMPOSITIONS SYNGENTA PARTICIPATIONS AG (CH) 2008-11-06 WO claimed
WO-2007104658-A2 METHOD OF INDUCING TOLERANCE OF PLANTS AGAINST BACTERIOSES BASF SE (DE) 2007-09-20 WO claimed
WO-2009124920-A2 EMULSIFIABLE CONCENTRATE BASF SE (DE) 2009-10-15 WO disclosed
US-20090011935-A1 Method of Inducing Tolerance of Plants Against Bacterioses BASF SE (DE) 2009-01-08 US disclosed
EP-1996018-A2 METHOD OF INDUCING TOLERANCE OF PLANTS AGAINST BACTERIOSES BASF SE (DE) 2008-12-03 EP disclosed
WO-2007104658-A2 METHOD OF INDUCING TOLERANCE OF PLANTS AGAINST BACTERIOSES BASF SE (DE) 2007-09-20 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20090011935-A1 Method of Inducing Tolerance of Plants Against Bacterioses BROX, CAT, SLC11A2 IRAK4 3741/4885HTT 2443/4885CTNNB1 4817/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.