SCHEMBL3732995

SCHEMBL3732995

CCOC(=O)N1CCN(Cc2ccc(F)c(CNC(=O)Nc3cncnc3)c2)CC1

nearest known ligand 0.48

Predicted protein targets (top 16)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
ALDH1A1 P00352 7/20 0.48
KDM4E B2RXH2 2/20 0.48
POLB P06746 1/20 0.48
DRD2 P14416 1/20 0.42
DRD4 P21917 1/20 0.42
NAMPT P43490 1/20 0.42
ALOX15 P16050 1/20 0.41
TDP1 Q9NUW8 1/20 0.41
KCNH2 Q12809 1/20 0.41
FAAH O00519 2/20 0.40
PLK4 O00444 1/20 0.40
PAK4 O96013 1/20 0.40
NTRK1 P04629 1/20 0.40
TBK1 Q9UHD2 1/20 0.40
MEN1 O00255 1/20 0.40
KMT2A Q03164 1/20 0.40

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL3735778 0.91 ALDH1A1 (0.48) ALDH1A1KDM4EPOLBDRD2DRD4
SCHEMBL3744319 0.88 ALDH1A1 (0.47) ALDH1A1KDM4EPOLBDRD2DRD4
SCHEMBL3733586 0.85 ALDH1A1 (0.45) ALDH1A1KDM4EPOLBDRD2DRD4
SCHEMBL3730582 0.85 PIK3CA (0.46) ALDH1A1KDM4EPOLBDRD2DRD4
SCHEMBL3738408 0.85 KDM4E (0.43) ALDH1A1KDM4ENAMPTPLK4PAK4
SCHEMBL4233094 0.84 ALDH1A1 (0.47) ALDH1A1KDM4EPOLBTDP1FAAH
SCHEMBL3731100 0.84 ALDH1A1 (0.43) ALDH1A1KDM4EPOLBNAMPT
SCHEMBL3728969 0.83 ALDH1A1 (0.42) ALDH1A1KDM4EPOLBDRD2DRD4
SCHEMBL3730569 0.82 ALDH1A1 (0.47) ALDH1A1KDM4EPOLBALOX15TDP1
SCHEMBL3742347 0.81 FAAH (0.41) ALDH1A1KDM4EPOLBNAMPTFAAH

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 8 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-7825120-B2 Certain substituted ((piperazin-1-ylmethyl)benzyl)ureas CYTOKINETICS, INC. (US) 2010-11-02 US claimed
EP-1959963-A2 CERTAIN CHEMICAL ENTITIES, COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS Cytokinetics, Inc. (US) 2008-08-27 EP claimed
US-20070197504-A1 Certain chemical entities, compositions and methods CYTOKINETICS, INC. 2007-08-23 US claimed
WO-2007089336-A2 CERTAIN CHEMICAL ENTITIES, COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS CYTOKINETICS, INC. (US) 2007-08-09 WO claimed
US-7825120-B2 Certain substituted ((piperazin-1-ylmethyl)benzyl)ureas CYTOKINETICS, INC. (US) 2010-11-02 US disclosed
EP-1959963-A2 CERTAIN CHEMICAL ENTITIES, COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS Cytokinetics, Inc. (US) 2008-08-27 EP disclosed
US-20070197504-A1 Certain chemical entities, compositions and methods CYTOKINETICS, INC. 2007-08-23 US disclosed
WO-2007089336-A2 CERTAIN CHEMICAL ENTITIES, COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS CYTOKINETICS, INC. (US) 2007-08-09 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20070197504-A1 Certain chemical entities, compositions and methods TNNI3, TNNT2, MYLK2 ALDH1A1 3619/4885KDM4E 2547/4885POLB 4326/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.