SCHEMBL3743372

SCHEMBL3743372

O=C(O)c1c(-c2ccccc2)c(O)nc2ccccc12

nearest known ligand 0.71

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
LMNA P02545 3/20 0.71
DHODH Q02127 6/20 0.61
PDE10A Q9Y233 4/20 0.61
TSHR P16473 1/20 0.55
CYP2D6 P10635 1/20 0.51
CYP2C19 P33261 1/20 0.51
GAA P10253 1/20 0.49
MAPT P10636 1/20 0.49
NPSR1 Q6W5P4 1/20 0.49
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 4/20 0.47
KDM4E B2RXH2 1/20 0.46
MEN1 O00255 2/20 0.45
KMT2A Q03164 2/20 0.45
FABP3 P05413 1/20 0.44
FABP4 P15090 1/20 0.44
PRNP P04156 1/20 0.44
PPARG P37231 1/20 0.44
RXFP1 Q9HBX9 1/20 0.44
NR2E3 Q9Y5X4 1/20 0.44
NCOR2 Q9Y618 1/20 0.44

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL16895273 0.89 LMNA (0.57) LMNADHODHPDE10ATSHRFABP3
SCHEMBL21451029 0.89 LMNA (0.57) LMNADHODHPDE10ATSHRKDM4E
SCHEMBL3737883 0.85 LMNA (0.54) LMNADHODHCYP2D6CYP2C19MAPT
SCHEMBL28117783 0.85 LMNA (0.54) LMNADHODHPDE10ATSHRCYP2D6
SCHEMBL2806955 0.84 LMNA (0.73) LMNADHODHPDE10ATSHRCYP2D6
SCHEMBL24122754 0.83 LMNA (1.00) LMNADHODHPDE10ATSHRCYP2D6
SCHEMBL10467326 0.82 DHODH (0.59) LMNADHODHPDE10ATSHRCYP2D6
SCHEMBL2934268 0.81 LMNA (0.69) LMNADHODHPDE10ATSHRCYP2D6
SCHEMBL3776440 0.81 LMNA (0.69) LMNADHODHPDE10ATSHRCYP2D6
SCHEMBL15491400 0.80 DHODH (0.67) LMNADHODHPDE10ATSHRCYP2D6

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 2 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-7829567-B2 Imino-indeno[1,2-c] quinoline derivatives, their preparation processes, and pharmaceutical compositions comprising the same KAOHSIUNG MEDICAL UNIVERSITY (TW) 2010-11-09 US disclosed
US-20090111987-A1 Imino-Indeno[1,2-c] quinoline derivatives, their preparation processes, and pharmaceutical compositions comprising the same KAOHSIUNG MEDICAL UNIVERSITY (TW) 2009-04-30 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20090111987-A1 Imino-Indeno[1,2-c] quinoline derivatives, their preparation processes, and pharmaceutical compositions comprising the same IMPA1, IMPDH1, IPO5 LMNA 714/4885DHODH 360/4885PDE10A 967/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.